On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Mike Morearty m...@morearty.com wrote:
Then let's say the Flash app hits the line where the breakpoint is.
The Flash player notifies Flash Builder of the breakpoint, and then
blocks, waiting on a socket until Flash Builder tells it what to do
next (e.g.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
I presume you're referring to Chrome extensions? I don't see the advantage
of making this depend on the plugin being distributed via extensions.
How else would an end-user get a plugin installed for Chrome? I don't
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Another alternative would be a ping type call to say I'm
unresponsive, and I mean it. Like a watchdog timer. The plug-in
could still effectively be hung, but at least it has to have things
together enough to call the
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Mike Mammarella m...@chromium.org wrote:
Perhaps rather than disabling the hang monitor altogether what that
could do is add an additional option to the warning the first time:
don't notify me again. If you click that, then it will disable the
hang monitor
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
For reference, something similar is done for popups:
void NPN_PushPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance, NPBool enabled);
void NPN_PopPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance);
Perhaps we can do the same thing here:
void
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Since the hang dialog comes up in the future after you've shifted your
focus elsewhere, if we did any sort of user interaction at all I'd
rather the plug-in could say Ask user for permission to disable hang
monitor for this
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
If this sounds good to you, the next step would be getting a broader
discussion with other browser vendors on the plugin-futures mailing list (
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/plugin-futures).
Since the other
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
Through whatever plugin installer they have (i.e. Flash's installer) or the
toolkit (i.e. Flash Builder).
So are you suggesting there is a better way to package an NPAPI plugin for
Chrome than to build a CRX? On
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:32 AM, giacomo.arcangeli
giacomo.arcang...@gmail.com wrote:
Some days ago I found a courious behaviour of Chromium (4.0.237.0
under ubuntu Linux) and Firefox on Paypal site.
Chromium tell me that the connection is under 112-bit ecnryption.
Firefox tell me that the
One thing that drives me nuts using GMail in Chrome compared to Firefox, is
the behavior of PgDn in a text area while holding shift. In Firefox, PgDn
extends the selection as well as scrolling the text area. In Chrome, it
leaves the selection alone and scrolls the text area.
Does anyone else
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
What's the benefit of omitting the virtual destructor?
There really shouldn't be any -- if you have any virtual functions at all,
you already have a vtbl entry and you are just adding at most one entry to a
single vtbl
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
What's the benefit of omitting the virtual destructor?
The benefit is that the destructor stays out of the vtable, which will
potentially reduce the vtable size and save a layer of indirection. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
