On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rafael Weinstein
rafa...@chromium.orgwrote:
LGTM also.
One thought: I've seen a few requests on the crx-dev mailing list for
API capabilities for both finding out when a process has
LGTM also.
One thought: I've seen a few requests on the crx-dev mailing list for
API capabilities for both finding out when a process has crashed and
also when it has become unresponsive. I'm unfamiliar with our code
that checks for a hung renderer. Would the process.cpu value be a
proxy for
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@chromium.orgwrote:
LGTM also.
One thought: I've seen a few requests on the crx-dev mailing list for
API capabilities for both finding out when a process has crashed and
also when it has become unresponsive. I'm unfamiliar with our
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@chromium.org
wrote:
LGTM also.
One thought: I've seen a few requests on the crx-dev mailing list for
API capabilities for both finding out when a process has
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@chromium.org
wrote:
LGTM also.
One thought: I've seen a few requests
Thanks. I've updated the proposal doc based on suggestions from this
discussion, including a global onUpdated event, notes about only providing
cross-platform statistics, and adding a tabs array to each Process for the
tabs associated with it (at least for renderer processes).
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks. I've updated the proposal doc based on suggestions from this
discussion, including a global onUpdated event, notes about only providing
cross-platform statistics, and adding a tabs array to each Process for the
Would it be possible to implement the same functionality using an NPAPI
plugin? Extensions are allowed to bundle native plugins and interact with
them from script.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi folks--
I've put together a proposal for a Chromium
Getting this information in a cross-platform way is a huge pain (do we even
do it properly for mac yet?), so it seems like a decent idea to let
extensions reuse the work done rather than reimplementing everything.
I'd suggest having the browser fire some sort of update event to the
extension
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
Getting this information in a cross-platform way is a huge pain (do we even
do it properly for mac yet?), so it seems like a decent idea to let
extensions reuse the work done rather than reimplementing everything.
I
(re-sending from chromium address)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
Getting this information in a cross-platform way is a huge pain (do we even
do it properly for mac yet?),
Yes, since yesterday (at least most of it).
Note that some of the memory
LGTM.
I agree that you should look into the broad (global, not per-process)
onUpdated event. For any active monitoring extension (vs. static display),
I would wager that this would result in a more efficient implementation than
having them poll.
I also agree with Aaron's answers to your open
12 matches
Mail list logo
