Re: [chrony-dev] [PATCH] nm-dispatcher: handle NTP servers from DHCP

2020-06-09 Thread Robert Fairley
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:54 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Would it make sense to add a suffix to the non-DHCP dispatcher script > (e.g .online -> 20-chrony-online) to avoid confusion with the two > scripts? Done - I gave it `onoffline` as a suffix, just to help suggest it applies for offline

Re: [chrony-dev] [PATCH] nm-dispatcher: handle NTP servers from DHCP

2020-06-09 Thread Robert Fairley
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:54 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Following up on the comments from bugzilla about reloading > configuration. > > chronyd cannot easily support reloading its configuration (e.g. due to > losing root privileges), but it could have a directive specific to NTP > sources. The

Re: [chrony-dev] Experimental NTS support

2020-06-09 Thread Bill Unruh
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: I must admit CVE-2020-13777 [1] has cooled me down a lot about GnuTLS. OpenSSL 3.0 (currently in alpha stage) will use the Apache License 2.0 which isn’t compatible with the GPLv2. Sigh,

Re: [chrony-dev] Experimental NTS support

2020-06-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: > I must admit CVE-2020-13777 [1] has cooled me down a lot about GnuTLS. > OpenSSL 3.0 (currently in alpha stage) will use the Apache License 2.0 which > isn’t compatible with the GPLv2. Sigh, what a mess! > > [1]

Re: [chrony-dev] [PATCH] nm-dispatcher: handle NTP servers from DHCP

2020-06-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:23:21PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote: > Attached an interdiff of the overall changes from last comments. > > I have also updated https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chrony/pull-request/3 > with the downstream patch that would be applied downstream to work with >