The problem I have with asciidoctor is that it seems to be a redhat only
thing, at least in rpms. One should then tell people how to get asciidoctor
in case their distro does not have it, and that one has to have ruby installed
in order to use it.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:46:53AM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote:
> Probably. I am a bit confused why asciidoctor would be used instead of, the
> seeming more prevalant, asciidoc, or either, set up by configure after testing
> what the system has.
asciidoc is an older and well-known implementation, but
