Re: [chrony-dev] New online/offline command

2018-05-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:11:58PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On auto-deployed config changes of virt systems (with plenty of switch > > interfaces for example) I've seen three digits per second (rare, but

Re: [chrony-dev] New online/offline command

2018-05-24 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:11:58PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > On auto-deployed config changes of virt systems (with plenty of switch > interfaces for example) I've seen three digits per second (rare, but > existing). And each one runs all NM dispatcher scripts? I suspect the bottleneck is

Re: [chrony-dev] New online/offline command

2018-05-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:44:30PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > No I'm fine with a single command. > > If it is low on cpu consumption and fast. > > We have to consider that in some environments you might

Re: [chrony-dev] New online/offline command

2018-05-24 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:54:49AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > With just one command neither Stephens nor my suggestion make sense. > > How about just "probe" then? > > I'm not sure. What exactly are we probing here? There are no packets > exchanged. It's just a local check of the routing

Re: [chrony-dev] New online/offline command

2018-05-24 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:44:30PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > No I'm fine with a single command. > If it is low on cpu consumption and fast. > We have to consider that in some environments you might have plenty > (really a lot) of changes ongoing. > And you might get a notification for