On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:24:56PM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
> I am now seeing better standard deviations with hardware timestamping than
> software timestamping. Thank you.
>
> Couple of caveats:
> - I need to disable priority scheduling (-P). With priority scheduling,
> software stamps still
I do not have xleave enabled. Can you explain more as to why you would expect
to see such an offset without xleave?
Thanks,
Denny
> On Nov 24, 2016, at 05:11, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> That suggests the interleaved mode is not working. Are the peers specified
> with the xleave option?
--
T
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:46:36AM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
> I do not have xleave enabled. Can you explain more as to why you would expect
> to see such an offset without xleave?
The offset is calculated from four timestamps. Two local and two
remote. Without xleave the peer can't deliver the TX
This makes sense. Thank you. I will enable xleave and retest shortly.
Denny
> On Nov 24, 2016, at 06:57, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:46:36AM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
>> I do not have xleave enabled. Can you explain more as to why you would
>> expect to see such an o
