On 21/08/2012 19:35, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
On 21/08/2012 16:31, Bill Unruh wrote:
> > The SHM is fed by a known-good process that works
with ntpd and also > here
Is it a secret which program you use?
No, it's not a secret, but it's in-house so
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
On 21/08/2012 19:35, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> On 21/08/2012 16:31, Bill Unruh wrote:
> > > > The SHM is fed by a known-good process that works
> > with ntpd and also > here
> >
> > Is it a secret
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
On 21/08/2012 16:31, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> On 20/08/2012 22:44, Bill Unruh wrote:
> > Hmm. How are you feeding the shm? The PPS source cannot give you the
> > seconds.
> > It is only accurate to
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:49:21PM +0100, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> On 20/08/2012 22:44, Bill Unruh wrote:
> >On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> >>[sw200319 /root]# chronyc sources
> >>210 Number of sources = 2
> >>MS Name/IP atddress Stratum Poll LastRx Last sample
>
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
On 20/08/2012 22:44, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> And when it *does* start up successfully, I find that after some time
> (this varies, but on last observation was around ten minutes after
> startup) my
