On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 01:08:44PM -0500, William Bergen wrote:
> Any advice to get the orphan mode working? I *think* this might be the
> option I need but I'm not positive. Alternatively I could delete the local
> directive on my two servers but I don't think that's quite right either
> since non
I think you might have meant to reply to another thread. I was following up
on a response I sent to Miroslav on 01/22.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 1:38 PM Bill Unruh wrote:
>
> Local means it gets the time from itself (Ie, it is a totally useless time
> source, and is used if the machine is a time s
Local means it gets the time from itself (Ie, it is a totally useless time
source, and is used if the machine is a time server to other machines and must
be kept running even if its time is off.)
Re the port, It is not clear to me what you are trying to do. Does the port
directive work if it is
Any advice to get the orphan mode working? I *think* this might be the
option I need but I'm not positive. Alternatively I could delete the local
directive on my two servers but I don't think that's quite right either
since none of the other clients/servers would select a source if both GPS
are off
> In SC06 there is "GPS A & B disagree" and "GPS B is inactive". How can
> they disagree when only one is working?
Ah my apologies, I made a mistake with the table. SC06 has both GPS sources
active but their measurements disagree. This is an edge case but it has
happened in practice.
> Is the ser
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 04:28:00PM -0500, William Bergen wrote:
> I’ve been spending quite a bit of time trying to configure the system to
> meet my needs but I can’t seem to satisfy every scenario simultaneously. I
> know this is complicated by the fact that there are only 2 servers in the
> netwo
