Hi,
Peter Humphrey recently posted about his findings with an apprently
racy init script, see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566972
So far we've concluded that indeed the init script is inherently racy
due to accidental double-forking. I've since then investigated this a
bit more (see
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:00:51PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> I haven't looked at the source yet, but it seems to me that loading and
> verifiying the configuration should not take several seconds before
> forking and returning. I don't have a ton of sources (2), they are all
> inhouse,
...and of course I get to answer my own question. :)
> I haven't looked at the source yet, but it seems to me that loading and
> verifiying the configuration should not take several seconds before
> forking and returning. I don't have a ton of sources (2), they are all
> inhouse, healthy,
