On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:07:53AM -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> > How about returning 0 if the clock was in a synchronised state (the
> > reference was updated at least once) and 1 if not? With -q that would
> > be 0 only if the clock was stepped.
>
> Yes, that would work for our situation.
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:32:35AM -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > The -t option is now in git. If you test it, please let me know if it
> > works for you as expected.
>
> Works perfectly !
Great.
> You will want to
On Dec 2, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:07:53AM -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>>> How about returning 0 if the clock was in a synchronised state (the
>>> reference was updated at least once) and 1 if not? With -q that would
>>> be 0