Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: The Wilderness Years and historical truth

2015-07-18 Thread 'Antoine Capet' via ChurchillChat

Dear Jonah,

Many thanks for this most useful indication, of considerable importance.

Horrible news, in fact - it means that though Sir Martin was the official historical adviser, the producers did not stick to the 
facts which he no doubt gave them.


I wonder what other people and events are pure fantasy in this TV series which I rated highly until you told us what Sir 
Martin himself thought of it.


I naïvely believed that, since Sir Martin had been the official historical adviser behind the series, everything in it was true 
to the facts !


This is the eternal problem associated with liars : when can you trust them ? In other words, the rivetting episodes about the 
Manchester cotton trade association and the India Bill might also be pure fantasy . . .


Why on earth do TV and film producers believe that they have a God-given right 
to take liberties with established facts ?

We all know the despicable meaning of being creative with the truth . . . !

Best wishes,

A.C.


From: Jonah Triebwssser
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 7:34 PM
To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: secret informants in 'In Search of Churchill'

I had the pleasure of being a guest in Sir Martin's home for tea many years ago. The conversation turned to The Wilderness Years. 
Sir Martin said that some characters were combined intio one, some events were compressed in time, and some events were pure 
fantasy. He was not happy with that. Regards-Jonah



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy.

 Original message 
From: 'Antoine Capet' via ChurchillChat
Date:07/18/2015 6:03 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: secret informants in 'In Search of Churchill'

Dear Ms Finnegan,

Thanks to the excellent index, as usual, I was able to find the relevant 
passage almost immediately : it runs from p.131 to p.135.

Incidentally, reading that passage again, I noticed that Sir Martin suggests 
that Ralph Wigram died of polio (bottom of p.133).
But in the excellent TV series, _The Wilderness Years_* (for which I seem to 
remember that Sir Martin was historical adviser),
Ralph Wigram is shown as committing suicide.

Any lights from List Members on this apparent contradiction ?

Best wishes,

A.C.

*Easily available on DVD, and unreservedly recommended
===

From: Pat Finnegan
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 10:19 PM
To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: stories in 'In Search of Churchill'

Hello, Professor Capet--

I think there was one story about how Sir Martin tracked down a man who had 
secretly given Churchill some reports about what
Hitler and the Nazis were doing during the 1930s--without PM Chamberlain's 
knowledge.   The man was afraid that he would be
killed--or at least seriously injured--if the truth came out.

I don't remember if Sir Martin mentioned the man's name, or gave him a 
pseudonym.   But the gentleman was afraid--even after more
than several decades!

Now I'll have to re-read 'In Search of Churchill' again!

(Ms.) Pat Finnegan


On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:01 PM, 'Antoine Capet' via ChurchillChat 
churchillchat@googlegroups.com wrote:
Dear Ms Finnegan,

When you write the stories of how he tracked down so many of Churchill's 
colleagues  were both very amusing--and something of a
'spy novel'! I do not know which is your favourite.

For my part, I was left speechless when I read how he had tracked down the 
estate agent (realtor, I think, in American English)
who negotiated the transaction for Chartwell - so many years after the event !

This is definitely my favourite story in the book.

Best wishes,

A.C.
=

From: PatFinn1940
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:53 PM
To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Another Image of Churchill

I have that 'warmer' photo by Karsh on my copy of Sir Martin's one-volume 
Churchill biography (it was the first book Sir Martin
sent me, after we began our correspondence in 2006).   It's one of my favorite 
Churchill photos.   I wonder how Karsh got him to
smile for it, after the 'scowling lion' one was taken?

And you are right about 'In Search of Churchill' being a 'masterpiece'.   It 
helped a lot with the background of how the young
Martin Gilbert became the 'official' biographer after Randolph Churchill's 
death.  And the stories of how he tracked down so many
of Churchill's colleagues  were both very amusing--and something of a 'spy 
novel'!

(Ms.) Pat Finnegan


On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 4:47:32 PM UTC-4, Antoine Capet wrote: Dear Terry,

No harm done in anglicising Adolf - except that the custom among historians is 
to anglicise the (first) names of kings, emperors
and popes : perhaps too great an honour for that man.

On a more serious note :

I was struck when recently reading the late Sir Martin's masterpiece, _ In 
Search of Churchill_ (by the way, many thanks to the
List Members who wrote it was priority reading - they were absolutely 

Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: The Wilderness Years and historical truth

2015-07-18 Thread Jon Lellenberg
I don't know what the truth is about Ralph Wigram's death, and would like
to know.  Wikipedia says:

Wigram's sudden death is somewhat mysterious. Again, sources disagree, on
several points. For one, some say he was found dead at home, but a letter
from Churchill says he died in Ava's arms.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-GuardianArticle-8[9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-Gilbert-9 His death
certificate recorded the cause of death as pulmonary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_lung haemorrhage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haemorrhage, but a letter from [British
historian] Henry Pelling indicates he committed suicide while deeply
depressed.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-GuardianArticle-8[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-Manchester-7 The
fact that his own parents did not attend his funeral is cited as support
for this theory (although Churchill and his family did attend, along with a
number of others such as Robert Vansittart
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gilbert_Vansittart and Brendan
Bracken https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Bracken).[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-GuardianArticle-8[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-Manchester-7 Churchill's
letters indicate (but only indirectly) that depression and suicide were the
cause.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-Manchester-7 Polio
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio has also been put forward as a cause
by some sources.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram#cite_note-ChurchillCentre-5

Source 8 is Thorpe, Vanessa (22 June 2002). The man who told Churchill to
take on Hitler. The Guardian.  This about controversies over not *The
Wilderness Years*, but Albert Finney's BBC production *The Gathering Storm*,
and cites its scriptwriter (Hugh Whitemore) saying: Churchill was a
natural leader, with no self-doubt, and that was what the nation needed.
But Wigram, he was just a normal man and not naturally brave, more like the
rest of us. I don't think he could cope. His death certificate says he died
of a pulmonary haemorrhage, but if I had to guess I would say it was
suicide. His own parents did not attend his funeral.  The entire article,
which inspires little confidence in the issue of Wigram's death, can be
read at http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/23/filmnews.film

Source 7 is William Manchester's *The Last Lion*, p. 193.  I'm away from
home and books, but this is apparently the Henry Pelling reference, and
perhaps someone can let us know what it says.



On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, 'Antoine Capet' via ChurchillChat 
churchillchat@googlegroups.com wrote:

 Dear Jonah,

 Many thanks for this most useful indication, of considerable importance.

 Horrible news, in fact - it means that though Sir Martin was the official
 historical adviser, the producers did not stick to the facts which he no
 doubt gave them.

 I wonder what other people and events are pure fantasy in this TV
 series which I rated highly until you told us what Sir Martin himself
 thought of it.

 I naïvely believed that, since Sir Martin had been the official historical
 adviser behind the series, everything in it was true to the facts !

 This is the eternal problem associated with liars : when can you trust
 them ? In other words, the rivetting episodes about the Manchester cotton
 trade association and the India Bill might also be pure fantasy . . .

 Why on earth do TV and film producers believe that they have a God-given
 right to take liberties with established facts ?

 We all know the despicable meaning of being creative with the truth . .
 . !

 Best wishes,

 A.C.
 

 From: Jonah Triebwssser
 Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 7:34 PM
 To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: secret informants in 'In Search of
 Churchill'

 I had the pleasure of being a guest in Sir Martin's home for tea many
 years ago. The conversation turned to The Wilderness Years. Sir Martin
 said that some characters were combined intio one, some events were
 compressed in time, and some events were pure fantasy. He was not happy
 with that. Regards-Jonah


 Sent from my Samsung Galaxy.

  Original message 
 From: 'Antoine Capet' via ChurchillChat
 Date:07/18/2015 6:03 AM (GMT-05:00)
 To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: secret informants in 'In Search of
 Churchill'

 Dear Ms Finnegan,

 Thanks to the excellent index, as usual, I was able to find the relevant
 passage almost immediately : it runs from p.131 to p.135.

 Incidentally, reading that passage again, I noticed that Sir Martin
 suggests that Ralph Wigram died of polio (bottom of p.133).
 But in the excellent TV series, _The Wilderness Years_* (for which I seem
 to remember that Sir Martin was historical adviser),
 Ralph Wigram is shown as committing suicide.

 Any lights from List Members on