[cia-drugs] Google: "Arrest Bush 41"
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Democrats to force Dobson to testify?
What madness is this? Teddy is losing it! -JR http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46718 Saturday, October 8, 2005 CHANGING OF THE GUARDDemocrats to force Dobson to testify?Senator wants to know if he's hiding Miers' pro-life views Posted: October 8, 20051:00 a.m. Eastern © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com James DobsonDemocrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee might subpoena James Dobson during the confirmation hearings for Harriet Miers to probe the family advocate about "confidential" information he has about the Supreme Court nominee, a Capitol Hill source says. Dobson recently said his endorsement of Miers was founded on "confidential" information he was "privy to" but "not at liberty to talk about," according to the political weblog Ankle Biting Pundits. Although not a Judiciary Committee member, Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., has taken up the cause, pitching the idea to top Democratic staffers on the panel. "It seems to me, all of the [information] the White House knows about Harriet Miers should be made available to the Senate and the American people," Salazar said. "If they're making information available to Dr. Dobson whom I respect and disagree with from time to time I believe that information should be shared equally with a U.S. senator." Citing "insiders," the weblog says Salazar believes Dobson should be called before the panel to answer what he knows about Miers, when he knew it and who provided him with the information. The unspoken suspicion is that someone in the Bush administration presumably presidential adviser Karl Rove told Dobson that Miers is pro-life and has pledged to vote against Roe v. Wade should she be confirmed, the weblog says. Some of Salazar's colleagues, however, including Minority Leader Harry Reid, believe calling Dobson before the committee as a hostile witness would be seen as a disastrous public relations stunt that would further alienate the Democrat Party from Christian conservatives. "We're not going to conduct an Inquisition," one top Hill staffer told the weblog. "Salazar's idea is half-baked." But another Hill staffer said Sen. Ted Kennedy, a Judiciary Committee member, likes the idea and is trying to craft it as a "separation of powers" issue rather than a religious issue. It might work, Kennedy believes, if Democrats can make it an issue of President Bush withholding information. If you would like to sound off on this issue, participate in today's WND Poll. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] SMOKE AND MIRRORS BABY - Washington Insider: Subway Alert Is Fake Terror To Distract From Indictments
SMOKE AND MIRRORS BABY The Great Texas Bank Job and W & Company's BOGUS ASS WAR in IRAQ, how many BILLIONS are now unaccounted for The Culture of Corruption Nancy Pelosi and many others are aware of is working feverishly to distract, derail and cloud MURKY WATERS to Cover Up massive POLITICAL and INJUSTICE SYSTEM CRIMES here and around the world. YUP the evil BASTARDS are using HELTER SKELTER to COVER UP THEIR INIQUITIES. The Great Texas Bank Job is REAL and sorry it DWARF's DeLays tempest in a teapot DISTRACTION !! Here's The Link the BLACK ROBES HATE The Technicalities, Loopholes, Secret Signs & INCANTATIONS will drive you CRAZY - JW http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/7/prweb258571.php There are some fine legal links at the bottom of OperationMissouriFreedom "it's no Joke" also [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably will be more specific on this subject ! Judson Witham Son Of Swamp FoxJudson WithamOperationMissouriFreedom "it's no Joke" No Justice - No Peace norgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Washington Insider: Subway Alert Is Fake Terror To Distract From Indictments Wayne Madsen | October 7 2005 After it was reported that Karl Rove had agreed to give further testimony to the Grand Jury investigating the CIA leak, Rove's attorney Robert Luskin denied his client had received a target letter from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, a formal "heads up" sent to individuals who are about to be indicted. However, it is being reported from well-informed sources throughout Washington that 1) target letters have been sent to Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, and Ari Fleischer; 2) Rove has agreed to testify and possibly agree to a plea bargain agreement in return for his testimony against other targets of the criminal probe; 3) Cheney and Bush may be named as unindicted co-conspirators; 4) Bush's "war speech" before the National Endowment for Democracy and a late Thursday afternoon report that "19 operatives" have arrived in New York City to place bombs on subway trains are blatant attempts by the White House to divert attention from the impending indictments against the Bush White House. The main stream media is just beginning to take notice that a "Watergate-level event" is about to occur in Washington. Question: if Bloomberg really thought there was a credible threat against the subway, would he be riding it? Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Re: BREAKING: Rove backs off grand jury testifying; Fears indictments
--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, MA PA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hmmmh, I am really curious how this story will end? Obviously he either has to crack the "facts" served by the other side: "Sorry, we did not know the lady was working under cover. We somehow thought she was some minor file clerk, trying to secure a job for her husband, to raise the family budget.." Or ... Good luck: Patrick J. Fitzgerald. ... -b http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/07/politics/07leak.html?pagewanted=print Recently lawyers said that they believed the prosecutor may be applying new legal theories to bring charges in the case. One new approach appears to involve the possible use of Chapter 37 of the federal espionage and censorship law, which makes it a crime for anyone who "willfully communicates, delivers, transfers or causes to be communicated" to someone "not entitled to receive it" classified information relating the national defense matters. Under this broad statute, a government official or a private citizen who passed classified information to anyone else in or outside the government could potentially be charged with a felony, if they transferred the information to someone without a security clearance to receive it. > > BREAKING: Rove backs off grand jury testifying; Fears indictments > Rove/Plame: Hurry up and wait > Karl Rove's going back to the grand jury--but not today. "A source close to Rove said Bush's chief political adviser and his legal team are now genuinely concerned he could face charges," write Leonnig and Vandenhei in the WashPost. "As recently as a week ago, people familiar with Rove's role in the affair said they believed he was in the clear because, after Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper testified in July about his conversation with Rove, Rove had not heard back from Fitzgerald." > > Continued: > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/3468518.html > > > BREAKING: Abramoff alleged co-conspirator Flanigan withdraws nomination at Justice > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/3468073.html > > > Complaint of Voter Fraud Filed Against... Karl Rove! > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/3468743.html > > > > CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWSWIRE - October 7th, 2005 > http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/2005/10/07/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARC PARENT > > CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/vseplB/TM ~-> Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[cia-drugs] FreeRepublic.com Owner: ''Pat Buchanan is a Traitor''
FreeRepublic.com Owner: ''Pat Buchanan is a Traitor'' http://sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2675 by Jim Robinson October 7, 2005 The Rockwellians joined the enemy a long time ago. The Rockwelians, Buchananites, paleocons, et al, all aligned themselves with France/Germany/Russia and Iraq against America when we went to war against Saddam Hussein. No surprise to me that they'd join in with the America hating Communist backed International ANSWER and the PinkOs. Traitors all. ... Revising and extending my remarks. Why do I call these guys traitors? Well, we recently had the opportunity to witness up close and personal the communist led International Answer and Code PinkO people in action in Crawford and DC. I can tell you first hand that these slimy creeps are the real deal. Socialists, Marxists, Communists, punk anarchists, leftist revolutionaries, you name it. America haters. Baby killers. They are absolutely in love with every slimeball communist/terrorist/tin-pot dictator in the world. They hate our way of life, hate our freedom and want no limits on the depths of their depravity. That's why they hate God and hate our constitution. No limits means NO limits. They cannot wait to dissolve our constitution, our borders and our national sovereignty and make us subservient to some global socialistic power. Star-crossed communist utopians dancing, spitting and cussing in the streets. It was a real sight to behold. Slimy, filthy, foulmouthed creeps. The same kind of long-haired weirdo hippy freaks that slimed us in the 60's. In fact many of them were resurrected hippies. Aging old communist farts trying to relive the glory days when they brought America to her knees and forced her to surrender to the Vietnam communists after having defeated them in battle. Thank you Walter Cronkite. Puke!. They hate America. Hate our troops. They are afraid that we're gonna win this war and bring peace and constitutional democracies to the Middle East. Can't have that. Spreading freedom would destroy their plans for global communism. They desperately want America to lose this war and the next one (which will be fought here at home if we do lose this one). And now we learn here today that Lew Rockwell is part of this filthy traitorous movement. I knew that he and Buchanan and many of the paleocons had long ago gone over the edge with their hate Bush campaigns, and that they sympathized with the French, German, Russian, Iraqi axis against America, but I didn't know how far they would go. Marching with communists in our nation's capital? Protesting at Army/Navy hospitals in full view of our recovering wounded servicemen? Parading in the streets with white crosses and makeshift coffins, spitting on the memory of our fallen heroes that fought and died for our country? Giving aid and comfort to the enemy during wartime? How low can you go? How can this be called anything but treason? If this is what the Rockwells and Buchanans and their followers want and believe, if they want to align themselves and protest against America and march arm-in-arm with their America hating communist comrades during wartime then they're nothing but traitors themselves and should own up to it. And the rest of us should recognize them for what they are and treat them accordingly. [click above for links to the rest of this mental meltdown] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/vseplB/TM ~-> Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[cia-drugs] The Case Against Tom DeLay By JOHN W. DEAN
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20051007.html The Case Against Tom DeLay: What Has Happened To Grand Jury Secrecy In Texas? By JOHN W. DEAN Friday, Oct. 07, 2005 What is one to make of the criminal charges against Tom DeLay? I spoke with several knowledgeable Texas lawyers, of both parties, about the case against DeLay; they were willing to speak, but only off-the-record. Or, as one put it, "Who in hell wants to get in the middle of a fight between a polecat and a skunk?" (I don't like unidentified sources. But I will use them in this column, only because they are sharing nothing more their expertise, no inside information. They were offering their professional "speculation," if you will.) There is no speculation, however, by the grand jurors who have spoken out in this case; they are familiar with the evidence prosecutors must have adduced, before them, to convince them to indict. And what they are saying appears dangerously close to breaking their oaths of secrecy. The Charges Against DeLay The (now) former Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives was indicted on September 28, and again on October 2, by two different Travis County, Texas grand juries. The second indictment is far more serious than the first. The first indictment charges DeLay with engaging in a criminal conspiracy in violation of Texas Penal Code Section 15.02. It states that DeLay and two of his associates (also indicted) agreed to make corporate political contributions which are prohibited by the Elections Code. If convicted, DeLay faces up to two years in jail and a $10,000 fine. Six days later came the second indictment, which is twice the length of the first, with its two counts. The first count charges another conspiracy under Section 15.02, again to violate the election law - but ALSO to launder corporate money, in violation of Texas Penal Code Section 34.02, the state's money laundering prohibition. The second count charges DeLay outright with the offense of money laundering, and because the amount of the money allegedly laundered exceeds $100,000, that is a felony punishable by life in prison. Not surprisingly, DeLay angrily responded that the charges are blatantly political, reckless, a sham, and "wholly unsupported by the facts." DeLay called the first indictment "one of the weakest, most baseless indictments in American history." He called the second indictment a "do over" by Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle, suggesting that Earle was facing a legally-strong motion to toss the first indictment as defective, and hedging his bets with the second indictment. The First Indictment Is Not Flawed But It Is Now Irrelevant All those with whom I spoke said that DeLay's attorney, Dick DeGuerin, is extremely able. As one former judge, a Democrat who knows the players well, told me, "DeGuerin is A-1, probably several notches above Ronnie Earle." DeGuerin successfully defended Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson when Earle indicted her in 1994. DeGuerin's motion to dismiss the first indictment has not been made public. All that is known is that the gist of his argument is a claim that the conspiracy statute cited in the initial indictment, Section 15.02 of the Texas Penal Code, was not applicable at the time of DeLay's purported offense, the alleged 2002 violation of the Election Code prohibiting corporate contributions. Despite DeGuerin's skill, one of my sources suggests his tactic in filing the motion to dismiss the first indictment when he did, may have been faulty. "DeGuerin probably pulled the trigger too fast," one attorney told me. "Had he waited until it was clear the statute of limitations had passed, and had he made it clear DeLay's waiver of the statute of limitations had ended, he might have done to Earle again what he did in the Kay Bailey Hutchinson case, and raise the technical error when it was too late to fix it. But by going in guns blazing, trying to blow Earle out of the water, Earle simply issued a second indictment to cover himself." Another Texas attorney told me he thought that, in any case, DeGuerin's technical argument about the defect in the first indictment would not fly. Texas has had a conspiracy statute forever. And it has had a prohibition against corporate contributions for about as long. So the fact that the state legislature did not get around to adding statutory language picking out, in particular, a conspiracy to violate the elections laws does not seem especially significant. Thus, it probably does not mean, as DeGuerin says, that there cannot be a conspiracy to violate the election laws. This lawyer, a former federal prosecutor, but now active criminal defense attorney, believes that any thinking judge will deny DeGuerin's motion to dismiss the first indictment. "But it's irrelevant now, with the second indictment," he added, "and DeLay is in much worse shape under the second indictment." Could The Second Indictment Be Barred By The Statute Of Limitations? But what if the sec
