Re: [cia-drugs] When We Go Out To Die Today

2006-08-02 Thread Arlene Johnson
(smile) These imposters seem to think that they should have all the land, but a 
few others feel otherwise. They are right. See 
http://www.truedemocracy.net/td-18/04.html

This Blog was Not found when I tried to log onto it.

Peace,

Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net

-Original Message-
From: muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 2, 2006 7:03 AM
To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cia-drugs] When We Go Out To Die Today

Not in anybody's video game.

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2006/08/so-basically-2-israeli-ground.\
html

Tuesday, August 01, 2006 So basically, 20,000 Israeli ground troops
(along with the Israeli air force and navy) are fighting against less
than 1,000 Hizbullah fighters. That says something about the pride and
glory of the Zionist state, does it not?

--

Or, as a former Israeli helicopter pilot said on Democracy Now last
week, American Christians like Pat Robertson, son of Absalom,need to
stop making a religion out of Israel. Their bible says that the Israel
of God is something entirely else than a coercive millenarian reich
extended by terror(Samhain Bush and Sons' Bush Warco bombs). The
Israelis are in Lebanon as Bush Warco mercenaries, terrorist bombers of
civilians, tinkers selling an unjust balance, neighborhood bullies
lusting after their bridge too far.

--

Prison walls force no shadow on midnight.
CIA drug dealer needs a street light
to cast a small shadow of the far right
by king cash money and a German gun fight
Nobody knows nothing with their flashlight
but Shadows read my name out in plain sight.

Stepping tap tap it ain't right not left out right
in your five star hotel midnight it ain't right
in your five star hotel sleeping sleeping right
on through other people's madness and fright
then Shadows hang your old name out inside
flowers old mould dust and dirt on in tight.







Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM
 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [cia-drugs] Fwd: [CTRL] Sean and his Internet Troll Warthogs ? prelude

2006-08-02 Thread Arlene Johnson
The definition of National Security is You remain ignorant so the 
powers-that-be will get richer because you are (ignorant).

I coined this. See if it isn't true.

Peace,

Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net the home of The Journal of History (La verdad 
sobre la democracia)
Click on the icon that says Magazine to access my e-zine.
Password for 2006: message

-Original Message-
From: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 2, 2006 4:43 AM
To: Cia-drugs Cia-drugs Cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
Cc: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [cia-drugs] Fwd: [CTRL] Sean and his Internet Troll Warthogs  ? 
prelude



Begin forwarded message:

 On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:51 AM, AK wrote:

 I am on other lists vexed with multiple anonymo trolls. You have  
 to wonder how muc of this is Unc Sam's information warriors, and  
 how much, if at all, sociopathic individuals with an axe to grind...

 AK

 On 8/1/06, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Caveat Lector-

 The sincere Internet troll Sean McBride and fellow trolls have been
 removed. It take several kinds of trolls to play the game.

 They play a game of sides, dialectics of dissension upon which to
 hang their hats of lies.

 Sean will not allow my posts on his board, even though he mentions
 me directly by name.

 A full report,  the Anatomy of a Troll Operation, is being compiled
 and posted with in the next couple of days.

 Peace,
 Kris Millegan

 PS. Expect some noise,



 It's meme warfare


 Do some study on Berlet,

 It is spook work.

 Yes there are kooks, but leading the pack is a spook 99 out of 100.

 I am been out in several fields for several years where you have  
 survivors (both victims and ex-operators), researchers, social  
 workers/sociology and other professors, journalists and ? the kooks  
 and spooks.

 What is it they say familiarity breeds ? ?

 For the victims, especially survivors my heart goes out.

 Blessings,
 Amen,

 Well, on to the subject.
 As you know in this day an age an Interent persona can be created  
 rather easily. People are social and generally trusting human beings.

 Pleasse visit here http://ctrl.org/MilleganStews/McBride- 
 Berlet.html and http://ctrl.org/MilleganStews/TheDevilJohnFoster.html

 and

 Do a google in google's groups heading for [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 and you can see Sean developing a compacc 800 and souping up to  
 be a super information gathering, sorting and retrieval system so  
 they would have all the latest screeds, boilerplate and real  
 research at their fingertips  so that they can extreme it. It is  
 essential that they control the extremes, because by that you  
 control the middle, allows them to gather information on players  
 both sociopaths (you could be useful) and researchers. And the  
 action disses the real research at the same time. Kudos all-round ?

 Sean McBride is an Internet troll living in a souped-up laptop.

 I am been studying the most recent event, the footprints in the  
 silica show foreknowledge of the latest Middle East carnage as  
 their attack on CIA-Drugs showed foreknowledge on 9/11. At least  
 foreknowledge of something, whether the actual actions , who knows.  
 Let us just say that have been pre-positioning them selves and  
 laying down drama.

 And I am sure that their are still some operating trolls and some  
 sleepers on ctrl that may wake-up.

 These guys are truly afraid of consensus understanding of their  
 many games.

 Let me just let me post a couple of the footprints of the latest  
 action.

 This first comes from Sean's political research yahoogroup. And  
 this is just part of the story, the drama play goes deep, because  
 they  create their current dynamic positions from past reckoning.

 Raz is the an other side attack troll.

 Here is some meat for the pack.

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/message/19910




 Israeli Ops in Internet Forums
   Message List

 Reply | Forward

 Message #19910 of 20599  Prev  Prev | Next  Next 
 Israeli Ops in Internet Forums

 File this under possibly significant.

 Some folks here will be aware of some peculiar anomalies and  
 behavior surrounding cia-drugs in recent years.  In particular, a  
 certain faction in cia-drugs went to extraordinary lengths to try  
 to suppress discussion about the role of neoconservatives and the  
 Israel lobby in the exploitation of 9/11 and the engineering of the  
 Iraq War.

 Check this:

 Some weeks ago a character named Razl Dazl, logging in from  
 Australia, appeared in the Yahoo group CTRL, spraying obscene and  
 violent verbal abuse at anyone whom he tagged as an enemy of Israel  
 (do a search in CTRL to sample his posts).  Razl Dazl has refused  
 to engage in any reasonable and factual discussion about Mideast  
 politics, evades all substantive questions that come his way, and  
 in general closely fits the profile of Jewish extremists and JDL  
 members who have been disrupting and vandalizing cyberspace for  
 

[cia-drugs] Maurice Strong: No better place to hide from American justice than China

2006-08-02 Thread norgesen






Maurice Strong
No better place to hide from American justice 
than China
By Judi McLeod 
Wednesday, August 2, 2006 

The tantalizing tale of missing Kofi Annan pointman Maurice Strong is no 
longer one of those puzzling unsolved mysteries.
Canadian `Chairman Mo', a big gun in the international arena, dropped right 
off the radar screen in April of 2005 when his alleged ties to the UN 
Oil-for-Food scandal cropped up and wouldn't go away.
According to the investigative Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Mo's location has 
been pinpointed, and it never required a Miss Marple to track him down.
AWOL Maurice Strong is alive and kicking in Beijing.
Canada Free Press, whose two favourite people to track are Mo and his 
sidekick, the self-reinvented-as-American-patriot Mikhail Gorbachev, always knew 
that Mo would return to China, his favourite place on Mother Earth.
What we didn't know, but read with relish in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 
is that the smooth-talking architect of the Kyoto Protocol, has no choice but to 
remain in the Orient,
"Maurice must now remain in China (where he is very welcome) to avoid 
questioning by the FBI and Canadian investigators about the $1 million that 
Tongsun gave him and which Mo tried to hide in his son Fred's nuclear power 
company, which now is bankrupt." (Pittsburg Tribune-Review, July 30, 2006.)
Pointing out that Strong is "very welcome" in China is a polite way of saying 
that he's right at home where overpaid environmental spin doctors have long 
claimed that Maurice Strong was the only man alive who could see that the United 
States of America is replaced by Communist China as world superpower.
That's where Mo's sidekick Mikhail Gorbachev--who was never really ever 
out--comes in. 
Gorbachev is living La Dolce Vita in San Francisco at the Presidio, where in 
1993, he had a three-star general present him the keys to his new digs.
International diplomats, no matter how anti-American, always arrive in the 
West with a soft landing. 
The Tribune-Review comes right out and throws sunlight on the business 
partnership Strong has with George Soros.
Like the bad guys in a spy movie, Strong and Soros teamed up on the Chery, a 
sort of poor man's made-in-China vehicle, with which they hope to flood the U.S. 
market next year.
CFP thinks that it's only natural that Strong would be dodging the 
authorities in China.
The Peoples' Republic of China is increasingly viewed as a country governed 
by a brutal regime, where just posting an anti-government essay on the Internet 
can get your imprisoned, or being Christian can get you killed.
Aside from addressing the occasional symposium on global warming, Chairman Mo 
remains on the lam in China.
Are Strong and other UN world players protected for life by something called 
UN international immunity?
Bringing Maurice Strong to justice would be as difficult as having him prove 
his credentials. Long ago his diplomatic status was bought for him, courtesy of 
an influential Canadian Liberal politician by the name of Paul Martin Sr., the 
late father of the recently defeated Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin Jr. 

The relationship between Strong and the Martins may be based on more than 
international politics, another Mo intrigue with a trail long ago gone cold. 

Maurice Strong, who keeps popping up in all the right places, has always been 
perceived as a cross between the Wizard of Oz and Dr. No.
It would be poetic justice of a sort if the gruesome trio of Maurice Strong 
Mikhail Gorbachev and George Soros would finish their days on earth in 
Beijing.
This is surely the place where the anti-American, commie loving aging 
activists belong.
Now if only they would call home the murderer by default of Blue Helmets, 
Kofi Annan.

Canada Free Press founding editor 
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years experience in the print 
media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig 
Standard.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover080206.htm
__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
  
  
United state life insurance
  
  
United state patent
  
  


United state patent search
  
  
United states patent office
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[cia-drugs] Super-Corridor to oblivion

2006-08-02 Thread norgesen






NAFTA, Immigration, North American Union
Super-Corridor to oblivion
Henry Lamb
Monday, July 31, 2006 
There is growing concern about the proposed "Super-Corridor" from the 
Southern tip of Mexico to Canada. The project, underway for more than a decade, 
is just now being introduced to the public. And the public doesn’t like what 
they are hearing.
Confusion about the project is rampant because the project is still primarily 
a concept, in the planning stages, and most of the final decisions will not be 
made for some time. Several very important decisions, however, have already been 
made.
The 
North American International Trade Corridor Partnership has officially 
amalgamated with the North American 
SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO) to promote the development of a trade 
corridor designed to expedite the flow of trade through the North American 
Continent.
NASCO is a not-for-profit lobbying organization that has received $2.5 
million in Congressional earmarks from the Department of Transportation to 
promote the corridor concept. Their 24-member board of directors includes county 
commissioners from four Texas Counties; an Oklahoma state senator, and a member 
of OK-DOT; two officials from the Texas DOT; attorneys, a couple of construction 
company officials, and an official of the U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce. 
Membership fees range from $500 for an individual, up to $25,000 for government 
entities. Membership includes several U.S. government 
entities.
NASCO claims that "There are no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway - it 
exists today as I-35." This, however, is at odds with reality.
On December 16, 2004, The Texas Transportation Commission, well represented 
in NASCO, entered into an agreement with a consortium called based in Spain, with tentacles into 
several other countries. The Comprehensive 
Development Agreement is open-ended (up to 50 years), and provides for many 
options along the way.
The goal is to build and operate a privately funded toll-corridor that 
includes up to 10 lanes of car and truck traffic, rail lines, pipelines and 
utilities, including communications systems. The current agreement is limited to 
Texas, but fits nicely into the master plan being advanced by NASCO. 
It also fits nicely into the vision of the Council on Foreign Relations’ 
recent report: Building 
a North American Community, which advocates "unlimited access to each 
other’s territory" (page 47), including allowing Mexican or Canadian companies 
to freely enter the U.S. to compete with U.S. trucking companies, hauling 
freight between U.S. cities.
This, of course, is essential to the creation of the North American Union, 
the goal of the Security 
and Prosperity Partnership. This Partnership includes enhanced border 
crossings for trade, and for individuals, using a new 
The fundamental transformation is to our system of governance; we are moving 
from the system of representative government set forth in the U.S. Constitution, 
to a system of collaborative policy-making by professional bureaucrats and 
business leaders. This outcome is precisely what the President’s Council on 
Sustainable Development called for in its 1993 We Believe 
Statements:

"We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; 
more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural, and financial 
resources in achieving our goals." (Statement No. 8)
What we really need are elected officials who listen to their constituents 
and refuse to be steam-rolled, or bought, by professional bureaucrats and 
business leaders.
The Texas Transportation Commission can withdraw from its agreement with 
Cintra-Zachry at anytime. Perhaps the voters in Texas can call for a referendum, 
to see if the people of Texas really want this Super-Corridor. The people of 
Texas could, once again, play a vital role in saving the United States.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/lamb073106.htm
__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
  
  
United state life insurance
  
  
United state patent
  
  


United state patent search
  
  
United states patent office
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[cia-drugs] Is Castro Dead?

2006-08-02 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OGY1ODlhY2FjOWFlMWNiMjk0ZWE3N2ViYjAyMjBlN2U=

Is Castro 
Dead?Mojitos 
all around! And brace for the hangover.By Mario Loyola

  
  

  In Communist societies, the fall of a 
  dictator is often marked by a public statement about the dictator’s 
  failing health that (a) doesn’t make sense, and (b) is not delivered by 
  the dictator himself. That’s what we saw on Monday night, when Cuban 
  dictator Fidel Castro issued a “letter to the people” in which he explains 
  that he had suffered intestinal bleeding due to stress, needed an 
  operation, and would be in bed for several weeks. The missive was coldly 
  Orwellian in how little it said about Castro — and in how much detail it 
  gave about those who were now “temporarily” assuming power. 
  The next day another Cuban official read a more 
  entertaining letter in which Castro purports to explain (again in pure 
  Newspeak) that because of the imminent threat from the United States, the 
  details of his health are now a state secret. But there’s only one detail 
  about Castro’s health that could possibly be a state secret: that he’s 
  dead.Sure, he could be in a coma. But any student of Communism can 
  say now with certainty that his reign is over. The only thing his heirs 
  care about now is figuring out who really controls the estate — and who’s 
  going to end up with it.Castro’s non-death declaration — 
  essentially his last will and testament — leaves a series of key posts, 
  and control of the state budget, to several senior leaders. But it only 
  establishes the initial position of the players. The real game starts now, 
  as the realities of internal power dynamics start making for unexpected 
  conflicts and strange bedfellows. This unstable phase of the struggle for 
  succession is highly characteristic in Communist regimes. It may last many 
  weeks or months, and it is doubtful, if history is any guide, that all of 
  the initial players will survive — literally. And in this case it is 
  almost inconceivable that when the dust settles, we will still be looking 
  at a Communist regime.So who are Castro’s heirs? The four big ones 
  are:
  Raúl Castro: Currently 
  defense minister, he is the anointed successor to his elder brother’s 
  post. He is remembered as one of the most brutal of the revolution’s 
  original leaders. Just a few months after the fall of strongman Fulgencio 
  Batista he executed scores of former army and police officers by machine 
  gun, disposing of them in a mass grave. More recently, he has turned the 
  armed forces into a sprawling fiefdom with its own farms, resorts, and 
  industrial holdings. He rarely speaks in public, is reputed to be a heavy 
  drinker, rarely gives interviews, and is not particularly well-liked. The 
  reality of his power base lies not in his popularity nor much less in the 
  Castro’s will, but rather in the fact that the succession to him has been 
  in train for decades. Men loyal to Raúl are in key positions of national, 
  provincial, and municipal power throughout Cuba. Raúl still romanticizes 
  the early years of the revolution as if they had happened yesterday. In 
  fact, he would rather not talk about anything that happened after the 
  vertiginous failure of his brother’s economic policies — in 1961. There is 
  reason to hope that he has lost interest in the Revolution generally, 
  aside from its perks, and may not have as much stomach for mass executions 
  as he once did. Yearbook entry: Most likely to have the 
  circumstances of his death explained by doctors. 
  Felipe “Filipito” Pérez 
  Roque: Currently foreign minister, Castro ascended 
  him to his current role after many years as personal secretary. Only 41 
  years old, he is known as Castro’s attack dog, perhaps the most frothing 
  castrista of the senior leaders. A lifetime of utter dependence 
  on Castro might not have left him in the most favorable position as a 
  potential successor. And as the foreign minister who helped make Cuba the 
  bride of Hugo Chavez, and then watched as Cuba became yesterday’s thrill 
  in the bordelo boliviariano, Filipito may have made lots 
  of enemies along the way. Yearbook entry: Most likely to become 
  chicharrón in time for New Year’s.
  Carlos Lage Dávila: Currently 
  a vice president in Cuba, and by training a doctor, Lage is an example of 
  the Revolution’s second-generation technocrat whiz-kids, who excel in 
  extracting a few pennies from Castro’s poverty machine. He is held in high 
  regard as an international negotiator, and appears to be well-liked in 
  Europe. As Castro’s right hand during the “Special Period” that followed 
  the end 

[cia-drugs] Bush's Embrace of Israel Shows Gap With Father

2006-08-02 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/02/washington/02prexy.html?_r=1oref=slogin

Bush’s Embrace of Israel Shows Gap With 
Father 
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: August 2, 2006

WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 — When they first met as United States president and 
Israeli prime minister, George W. Bush made clear to Ariel Sharon he would not follow in the footsteps of 
his father.
The first President Bush had been tough on Israel, especially the Israeli settlements in occupied 
lands that Mr. Sharon had helped develop. But over tea in the Oval Office that 
day in March 2001 — six months before the Sept. 11 attacks tightened their bond 
— the new president signaled a strong predisposition to support Israel.
“He told Sharon in that first meeting that I’ll use force to protect Israel, 
which was kind of a shock to everybody,” said one person present, given 
anonymity to speak about a private conversation. “It was like, ‘Whoa, where did 
that come from?’ “ 
That embrace of Israel represents a generational and philosophical divide 
between the Bushes, one that is exacerbating the friction that has been building 
between their camps of advisers and loyalists over foreign policy more 
generally. As the president continues to stand by Israel in its campaign against 
Hezbollah — even after a weekend attack that left many 
Lebanese civilians dead and provoked international condemnation — some advisers 
to the father are expressing deep unease with the Israel policies of the 
son.
“The current approach simply is not leading toward a solution to the crisis, 
or even a winding down of the crisis,” said Richard N. Haass, who advised the 
first President Bush on the Middle East and worked as a senior State Department 
official in the current president’s first term. “There are times at which a 
hands-off policy can be justified. It’s not obvious to me that this is one of 
them.”
Unlike the first President Bush, who viewed himself as a neutral arbiter in 
the delicate politics of the Middle East, the current president sees his role 
through the prism of the fight against terrorism. This President Bush, unlike 
his father, also has deep roots in the evangelical Christian community, a 
staunchly pro-Israeli component of his conservative Republican base.
The first President Bush came to the Oval Office with long diplomatic 
experience, strong ties to Arab leaders and a realpolitik view that held the 
United States should pursue its own strategic interests, not high-minded goals 
like democracy, even if it meant negotiating with undemocratic governments like 
Syria and Iran.
The current President Bush has practically cut off Syria and Iran, overlaying 
his fight against terrorism with the aim of creating what Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice calls “a new Middle East.” In allying 
himself so closely with Israel, he has departed not just from his father’s 
approach but also from those of all his recent predecessors, who saw themselves 
first and foremost as brokers in the region.
In a speech Monday in Miami, Mr. Bush offered what turned out to be an 
implicit criticism of his father’s approach.
“The current crisis is part of a larger struggle between the forces of 
freedom and the forces of terror in the Middle East,” Mr. Bush said. “For 
decades, the status quo in the Middle East permitted tyranny and terror to 
thrive. And as we saw on September the 11th, the status quo in the Middle East 
led to death and destruction in the United States.”
Now, as Mr. Bush faces growing pressure from Arab leaders and European allies 
to end the current wave of violence, these differences between father and son 
have come into sharp relief. 
“There is a danger in a policy in which there is no daylight whatsoever 
between the government of Israel and the government of the United States,” said 
Aaron David Miller, an Arab-Israeli negotiator for both Bush administrations, 
who has high praise for James A. Baker III, the first President Bush’s 
secretary of state. “Bush One and James Baker would never have allowed that to 
happen.”
Other advisers who served the elder Mr. Bush are critical as well, faulting 
the current administration for having “put diplomacy on the back burner in the 
hope that unattractive regimes would fall,” in the words of Mr. Haass. 
Whether the disagreement extends to father and son is unclear. The president 
has been generally critical of the Middle East policies of his predecessors in 
both parties, but has never criticized his father explicitly. The first 
President Bush has made it a practice not to comment on the administration of 
his son, but his spokesman, Tom Frechette, said he supports the younger Mr. Bush 
“100 percent.”
Brent Scowcroft, the former national security adviser, who has been openly 
critical of the current president on Iraq, did not return calls seeking comment. 
He wrote an opinion article in The Washington Post on Sunday calling on the 
United States to “seize this opportunity” to reach a comprehensive 

Re: [cia-drugs] US Begins Iraq Withdrawal Today

2006-08-02 Thread Sumerian..



Good coverage about the chimp man.In fact the increase of soldiers in Baghdad, is a kind of collection the soldiers in Baghdad before running away from Baghdad (Saigon).. Very clever understanding of truth behind the lies we hear from president chimp.muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  7/25/2006 Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki delivered an ultimatum today to the twice unelected smirking chimp Vietnam deserter and chief pab ramf chickenhawk of fourth generation Bush
 Warco."Clearly and candidly", diplo lingo for laying down the law, al-Maliki demanded that Bush Warco begin withdrawal of its supremely unpopular liberation army-of-one from Iraq today, if not sooner.Bush Warco advertising department has already popped smoke to cover US retreat from Iraq to the vicinity of the Baghdad airport. Goebbels is casting the first stage of US withdrawal, consisting of moving US troops from the provinces to the Iraqi capital, as "sure to increase security" in Saigon, putting more US troops on the streets of Cholon. 
	
		See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com.  Check it out.

__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
  
  
United state life insurance
  
  
United state patent
  
  


United state patent search
  
  
United states patent office
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[cia-drugs] Coming Through! The NAFTA Super Highway

2006-08-02 Thread norgesen





Coming Through! The NAFTA Super Highway 
by Kelly TaylorAugust 7, 
2006

The planned 
NAFTA Super Highway would radically reconfigure not only the physical landscape 
of these United States, but our political and economic landscapes as well. 
(Click here totell 
your representative and senators to"Stop the NAFTA Super Highway 
Steppingstone to a North American Union.") 
Kelly Taylor is an Austin-based 
writer and filmmaker, and the producer of a politically based TV talk show. 


All across America, mammoth construction projects are preparing to launch. 
The NAFTA Super Highway is on a fast track and it's headed your way. If you 
don't help derail it, you may soon be run over by it - both figuratively and 
literally.
The NAFTA Super Highway is a venture unlike any previous highway construction 
project. It is actually a daisy chain of dozens of corridors and coordinated 
projects that are expected to stretch out for several decades, cost hundreds 
of billions of dollars, and end up radically reconfiguring not only the 
physical landscape of these United States, but our political and economic 
landscapes as well.
In Texas, the NAFTA Super Highway is being sold as the Trans Texas Corridor. 
In simplest terms, the TTC is a superhighway system including tollways for 
passenger vehicles and trucks; lanes for commercial and freight trucks; tracks 
for commuter rail and high-speed freight rail; depots for all rail lines; 
pipelines for oil, water, and natural gas; and electrical towers and cabling for 
communication and telephone lines. One of the proposed corridor routes, TTC-35, 
is parallel to the present Interstate Highway 35 (I-35), slightly to the east, 
running north from Mexico to Canada. Its present scope is 4,000 miles long, 
1,200 feet wide, with an estimated cost of $183 billion of taxpayer 
funds. It runs through Kansas City.
Integration vs. Independence
How would all of this affect you, your family, and your community? Let us 
count the ways. One of the most striking features of the proposed Super Highway 
is the plan to do away with our borders, as evidenced by the joint U.S.-Mexico 
Customs facility already under construction in Kansas City, Missouri. A U.S. 
Customs checkpoint in Kansas City? But that's a thousand miles inside America's 
heartland; isn't the purpose of U.S. Customs to check people and cargo at our 
borders?
Ah, but the mere asking of that question shows that you're still operating 
under the old paradigm that sees the United States as an independent, 
sovereign nation. However, that paradigm began to change following passage of 
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994. NAFTA, which was sold 
to the American public as a simple trade agreement, was actually far more than 
that, setting in motion a process for the gradual social, economic, and 
political "integration," or merger, of the three NAFTA countries - Canada, the 
United States, and Mexico - into a North American Union.
In 2005, this merger process became more explicit and aggressive when 
President Bush, Mexico's President Vicente Fox, and Canada's Prime Minister 
Martin launched what they call the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North 
America (SPP). Any serious study of the SPP will clearly reveal that its 
ultimate aim is the dissolution of the United States into a North American Union 
patterned after the increasingly dictatorial regional government now running the 
European Union. Henceforth, under this plan, the borders between our nations 
will be incrementally erased in favor of a joint "perimeter" around all three 
countries.
One part of this plan calls for streamlining the flow of traffic from Mexico, 
including a massive increase in containers from China and the Far East 
offloading at Mexican seaports and then being transported by truck and rail into 
the United States via the new NAFTA Super Highway. These new cargo streams would 
cross the border in supposedly secure FAST lanes, checked only electronically 
until the first Customs stop in Kansas City!
What about all the repeated promises by the White House and Congress to make 
border security America's "top priority"? Moving Customs inspections hundreds of 
miles inland obviously contradicts those promises and incalculably increases the 
opportunities for smugglers (of drugs, illegal aliens, terrorists, weapons of 
mass destruction, and other contraband) to enter the country. Our borders are 
already incredibly porous and undermanned; securing the entire route from the 
Mexico-Texas border to Kansas City would require thousands more Border 
Patrol and Customs officers. Would these agents be provided? Could this route be 
made any more secure than our southern border? Does it make sense to effectively 
extend the border via this route when we are now doing such a poor job securing 
our existing border?
Under the Radar
Moreover, we can expect that similar inland joint Customs facilities, like 
the one in Kansas City, will be 

[cia-drugs] Peter Levenda on Dreamland radio show this weekend

2006-08-02 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





http://www.sinisterforces.info/forum/viewtopic.php?t=439

Peter on "Dreamland" radio show this 
weekend
the following is from the latest unknowncountry.com 
newsletter: - Sinister Forces 3 has arrived and we kick 
off our examination of this monumental book with a three-way interview between 
Whitley Strieber, Peter Levenda and Jim Marrs about the recent collapse of 
Chile's Nazi enclave, Colonia Dignidad and the arrest of its leader for child 
molestation, and the role that former Nazis play in the world today. 
Sininster Forces 3 contains some of the most interesting material ever 
written about Whitley Strieber's early years, and he and Peter Levenda will be 
discussing this and the many other conclusions reached in this incredible book 
in future editions of Dreamland. You don't need to have read Sinister 
Forces 1 and 2 to get into Sinister Forces 3, because Peter is careful to refer 
back to his earlier works whenever necessary. This is certainly one of 
the most important books of its kind ever written. It is, in fact, a monumental 
job of research that clearly identifies the dark occult underground that is in 
control of our world at the present time. Why is there no UFO 
disclosure? Because this would give the ordinary man the power of great 
knowledge. Why is the fact that we are heading for environmental catastrophe 
being hidden? Because revealing this might enable us to prevent the reduction in 
human population that the power elite wants--and never mind the incredible 
suffering that we ordinary folk must endure. Read Sinister Forces 3. 
Learn who your masters are, and who they serve... 

__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
  
  
United state life insurance
  
  
United state patent
  
  


United state patent search
  
  
United states patent office
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[cia-drugs] Re: US Begins Iraq Withdrawal Today

2006-08-02 Thread muckblit
Noam Chomsky is the best teacher of how to read the news from
propaganda. We have also noted here that Ed Lansdale started out in
advertising, and first and second of four generations of Bush Warco's ad
man Goebbels said he was going to use British and American business
advertising to sell nazism, and our US media today are owned by Bush
Warco companies. Chomsky calls Bush Warco or war corporatism 1920's
style militarized state capitalism, and their advertising has not
changed. If it ain't broke don't fix it, says fourth generation Bush
Warco. What we are witnessing is just WW2 continued, and that puts a
smirk on the chimp every morning fourth generation WW2 Bush Warco Shock
and Awe Big Lie advertising rolls on.

They are consciously reading between the lines and debunking at
http://angryarab.blogspot.com/ and today it becomes apparent that the
reason the Israelis have attacked another hospital was to capture the
ubiquitous Haji aka Kilroy. Another Mission Impossible realized as
Mission Accomplished by the master racists.

And the Israelis probably bombed Qana just to move the focus of US media
away from the rout of Bush Warco mercs and their tanks at two Lebanese
villages. Then they came back with 20,000 ground troops against 1000
Hezbollah fighters, and it looked like the Alamo, but surprise,
Hezbollah's previous days of 6-8 rockets, compared to 150 on the village
rout days, today 300, twice as many, so no last day for Alamo 1000 yet.

Hezbollah fighters should pin raccoon tails on their head wraps. We will
have to do it for them, in Adobe Photoshop.

I feel confident that the determined valour and desperate courage
heretofore envinced by my men will not fail them in the last struggle.
And although they may be sacrificed to the vengeance of a Gothic(WW2)
enemy, the victory will cost the enemy so dear, that it will be worse
for him than a defeat. Take care of my little boy. If the country should
be saved, I may make for him a splendid fortune. But if the country
should be lost and I should perish, he will have nothing but the proud
recollection that he is the son of a man who died for his country.

Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna as President of Mexico:

He quickly transformed the Presidency into a dictatorship, abolished the
constitution of 1824, and reneged on the land deals offered by the
former Mexican government. And just as quickly, the Texans began to show
their disapproval.

Except for a handful of men who had arrived with Travis and Bowie, the
majority of the Alamo defenders were not professional soldiers. They
were San Antonio citizens, both Mexican and American, farmers who stayed
to defend the land they had worked so hard to call their own.

http://www.violetcrown.com/abdul/images2/sa405.jpg
http://www.violetcrown.com/abdul/alamo4.htm

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Sumerian.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Good coverage about the chimp man.

   In fact the increase of soldiers in Baghdad, is a kind of collection
the soldiers in Baghdad before running away from Baghdad (Saigon).. Very
clever understanding of truth behind the lies we hear from president
chimp.

 muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   7/25/2006 Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki delivered an
ultimatum today to the twice unelected smirking chimp Vietnam deserter
and chief pab ramf chickenhawk of fourth generation Bush Warco.

 Clearly and candidly, diplo lingo for laying down the law, al-Maliki
demanded that Bush Warco begin withdrawal of its supremely unpopular
liberation army-of-one from Iraq today, if not sooner.

 Bush Warco advertising department has already popped smoke to cover US
retreat from Iraq to the vicinity of the Baghdad airport. Goebbels is
casting the first stage of US withdrawal, consisting of moving US troops
from the provinces to the Iraqi capital, as sure to increase security
in Saigon, putting more US troops on the streets of Cholon.





 -
 See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com.  Check it out.







Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/