[cia-drugs] Re: Britain's MI6 KILLED DANIEL PEARL SAYS PAKISTANI PRESIDENT

2006-10-02 Thread muckblit



Don't get too excited. Formerly Pakistan said that India ran Omar and killed Pearl to make Pak ISI look bad, and Omar was instructed to say that he killed Pearl to embarrass Pak ISI. Trouble is that Omar turned himself in to his commanding officer in Pak ISI a week before he was turned over to Pak police, so he was briefed to say he wanted to embarrass the Pak government, and then Pak ISI would fill in the legend that India ran Omar. Now, MI6. In fact, MI6, CIA, and Pak ISI worked on 911 together, and killing Pearl was part of 911, paving the way for Porter Goss, Omar's boss by way of Pak ISI General Mahmud Amad, to become director of CIA.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_PearlOn February 21, 2002, a videotape titled "The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl" was released.http://www.9-11commission.gov/about/faq.htmHas the Commission used its power of subpoena? [NO! not one individual was sub-poenaed!]  
			The
Commission has issued three subpoenas of government agencies: the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Department of Defense, and
the City of New York. In all three instances, the issues were resolved
amicably, without litigation. The Commission received the access that
was necessary to fulfill its mandatehttp://www.9-11commission.gov/about/faq.htm#q2When was the Commission created, and when is it supposed to report? 
			The
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (known
as the 9-11 Commission) was created by Public Law 107-306, signed by
the President on November 27, 2002. P.L. 107-306 originally required
the Commission to report to the President and Congress 18 months after
enactment, or no later than May 27, 2004. Recently Congress passed and
the President signed legislation which extends the reporting deadline
by two months, to July 26http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040810-3.html
August 10, 2004 8:31 A.M. EDT THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all for coming.  I'm pleased to announce
my decision to nominate Congressman Porter Goss as the next Director of
the Central Intelligence AgencyMurdering Pearl allowed the 911 Commission to omit details Pearl would have published about 911 after interviewing Omar and KSM. The 911 Commission did not mention Porter Goss meeting with Pak ISI's director, who himself ordered his man Omar to fund lead hijacker Atta in Porter's hometown(see Daniel Hopsicker http://www.madcowprod.com ).Would be hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui concurs that Omar was MI6/CIA/FBI, but so were they all, all of al-CIA-duh, from the days of the Muslim Brotherhood and Osama bin Laden working for CIA in many countries.There is a chance that Omar believed Pearl was being kidnapped to make the demands as stated as soon as Pearl was kidnapped, and that CIA/MI6 escalated to killing Pearl in order to sanitize the 911 Commission Report and make Porter Goss director of CIA. NOTE that would mean MI6 killed Pearl, but not according to Musharaf's scenario of using Omar to do it. Omar did what Pak ISI ordered him to, and no less, in any case not killing Pearl or deciding on his own to have Pearl killed.Khalid Sheikh Mohamed was not mentioned as having been present when Pearl was beheaded, but KSM was present when the longtime kidnapper Saud Memon's contract kidnapping gang which worked with Omar was arrested on September 11, 2002.KSM would have been arrested for WTCbomb if he had not been al-CIA-duh. And the 911 Commission would have told us that KSM was Pakistani if he was not al-CIA-duh. The 911 Commission would have told us Omar was Pakistani if he was not al-CIA-duh, but he was, so the report inserts the name of an Egyptian who was arrested before 911 in place of Omar's name. That spells al-CIA-duh because the Egyptian was in custody when he would have sent $200,000 to Atta, which exposes the 911 Commission report as a fraud again.-Bob--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  - Original Message -  From: Ron Corvus  To: TruePatriotsUnite  Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 8:54 PM Subject: [new_patriots] Britain's MI6 KILLED DANIEL PEARL SAYS PAKISTANI PRESIDENT(England's) MI6 KILLED DANIEL PEARL SAYS PAKISTANI PRESIDENT  http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2item_no=110171version=1template_id=41parent_id=23 President dubs alleged Pearl killer MI6 spy Published: Friday, 29 September, 2006, 01:06 PM Doha Time   LONDON: Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf has disclosed that Omar  Sheikh, who kidnapped and murdered American journalist Daniel Pearl and is  now facing death penalty, was actually the British secret Agency MI6's agent  and had executed certain missions on their behest before coming to Pakistan  and visiting Afghanistan to meet Osama and Mullah Omar.   General Musharraf's book has also given a new twist to the whole drama of  kidnapping and murder of American journalist as many believe here British  national Omar Sheikh might use Musharraf's 

[cia-drugs] China Jockeys For S. American Oil

2006-10-02 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2006/09/29/latin-american-oil-biz-cx_1002oxford.html

China Jockeys For S. 
American OilOxford Analytica 10.02.06, 6:00 AM ET 

Latin America is a major source of commodities for China. Given the 
traditional dominance of U.S. companies and markets, questions arise as to 
whether China poses a serious threat to U.S. hydrocarbon hegemony in the region. 

China is the world's second largest consumer of oil and is clearly interested 
in the region as a source of oil and gas. However, major oil and gas deposits 
are found on the eastern side of the Andes, which makes exporting to China a 
significant challenge. 
Unsurprisingly, the combination of this geology and geography, and the 
relative proximity of the U.S. market, means that most regional hydrocarbon 
infrastructure looks east to the Atlantic or north to the Caribbean. As such, 
even where it is able to secure preferential access to production, China faces 
the costly choice of either having to haul the hydrocarbons further or 
constructing new westward-facing infrastructure to allow trans-Pacific shipment. 

Simply by virtue of its demand for hydrocarbons, China is playing a useful 
role for countries such as Venezuela and Bolivia, providing a timely alternative 
to the "Western" international oil and gas companies. 
The prevailing model of hydrocarbon development in most countries has 
essentially been built around international oil companies developing the oil and 
putting it onto the international market. However, if other national 
considerations come into play, hydrocarbon development by companies representing 
and operating in a new market such as China may be perceived as offering greater 
value. In addition, if the host country sees hydrocarbon development as a 
vehicle for national economic and social development, an offer within a 
bilateral framework to fund and build a range of needed infrastructure could be 
attractive. 
The other element that contributes to national policy formulation in this 
area is a country's attitude toward the U.S. While China may have taken 
advantage of this, it seems most likely that it is entering the region without 
overt political expectations or demands. However, Chinese economic expansion may 
have political/geopolitical consequences: 
1. Venezuela. Caracas' current political priorities would appear to 
complement China's energy strategy. During President Hugo Chavez's visit to 
China in late August, a range of deals were announced, principally linked to 
energy. These come on the back of a relatively well established Chinese presence 
in the Venezuelan oil industry. 
From China's perspective these factors appear likely to offset Venezuela's 
relatively disadvantaged geographic location and the cost of upgrading Chinese 
refining capacity to handle heavy sour Venezuelan crude. It is thus no surprise 
that it is China's primary energy development focus in the region. 
2. Colombia. In August, India's Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and 
China's Sinopec acquired a 50% stake in Omimex de Colombia. They may view this 
simply as another opportunity to expand a diversified portfolio of oil and gas 
assets or may see Colombia as part of an integrated subregional energy strategy 
alongside Venezuela. 

3. Brazil. China National Overseas Oil Corporation is reported to be 
examining options with Petrobras in refining, pipelines and exploration, and 
Sinopec is reaching agreement for a $1 billion gas pipeline to cross Brazil. 
However, Petrobras has so far succeeded in retaining Brazil's material upstream 
"jewels" for itself. Petrobras is expanding its overseas upstream operations and 
is thus a competitor with China internationally. 
4. Bolivia. Shengli International Petroleum Development has opened an 
office and is reportedly willing to invest up to $1.5 billion. Exporting 
Bolivian gas to China would necessitate construction of a cross-country, 
trans-Andean gas pipeline and new liquefaction and port facilities on the 
Pacific coast. This has thus far frozen the project, with the economic 
requirement of a Chilean export plant foundering on historical Bolivian claims 
to the relevant part of the Chilean coast.
5. Peru. China National Petroleum Corporation has a 45% stake in 
Pluspetrol Norte, Peru's largest operator. 

6. Ecuador. A Chinese consortium including CNPC and Sinopec has 
purchased $1.4 billion dollars in oil assets from Canadian EnCana. 

7. Argentina. $5 billion has been committed to the oil industry. 

China faces numerous risks in the Latin American hydrocarbon sector. With the 
possible exception of extra heavy oil upgrading in Venezuela, China's portfolio 
could consist of small, high-cost assets whose competitiveness will be 
questionable in a lower oil price scenario.

To 
read an extended version of this article, log on to Oxford Analytica's Web site. 

Oxford Analytica is an independent strategic-consulting firm drawing on a 
network of more than 1,000 

[cia-drugs] Bend Over America - You ALL Guvmint Slaves

2006-10-02 Thread judson witham



I found this in my email this morning AND MAN it is SO TRUEWAKE UP  Son Of Swamp Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: "Son Of Swamp Fox" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:15:44 -Subject: [Power Hour II] Bend Over America - You ALL Guvmint SlavesThe politicians in Congress think nothing of squandering our money. Allthey have
 to do isgo to Congress and "appropriate" some more. Hey, money for nothing...It never occurs to these folks that there are people with lives on theother end of theirendless stream of appropriations, or maybe it does and they just don'tcare. But, like Bush'41 who didn't have a clue about the grocery star and what goes on belowthe glassceiling, our Congress doesn't trouble their heads over the little peoplefrom whom they arebasically stealing all of this money. Where is Mme. DeFarge when youneed her?Congress ordered up another 70 BILLION dollars recently. It would serveus all to have acloser look as to exactly what one billion means.Check this out:Komodo***What is a billion???The next time you hear a politician use the word "billion" in acasual manner, think about whether you want the "politicians"spending your tax money.A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,
 but one advertisingagency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspectivein one of its releases.a. A billion seconds ago it was 1959.b. A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive. (if ofcourse, he ever was alive)c. A billion hours ago our ancestors were living inthe Stone Age.d. A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth ontwo feet.e. A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.While this thought is still fresh in our brain, let's take a look atNew Orleans. It's amazing what you can learn with some simpledivision .Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D), is presently asking theCongress for $250 BILLION to rebuild New Orleans. Interestingnumber, what does it mean?a. Well, if you are one of 484,674 residents of NewOrleans (every man, woman, child), you each get $516,528.b. Or, if you have one of the
 188,251 homes in NewOrleans, your home gets $1,329,787.c. Or, if you are a family of four, your familygets $2,066,012.Washington, D.C .. HELLO!!! ... Are all your calculators broken??This is too true to be very funnyTax his land,Tax his wage,Tax his bed in which he lays.Tax his tractor,Tax his mule,Teach him taxes is the rule.Tax his cow,Tax his goat,Tax his pants,Tax his coat.Tax his ties,Tax his shirts,Tax his work,Tax his dirt.Tax his tobacco,Tax his drink,Tax him if he tries to think.Tax his booze,Tax his beers,If he cries,Tax his tears.Tax his bills,Tax his gas,Tax his notes,Tax his cash.Tax him good and let him knowThat after taxes, he has no dough.If he hollers,Tax him more,Tax him until he's good and sore.Tax his coffin,Tax his grave,Tax the sod in which he
 lays.Put these words upon his tomb,"Taxes drove me to my doom!"And when he's gone,We won't relax,We'll still be after the inheritance TAX!!Accounts Receivable TaxBuilding Permit TaxCDL License TaxCigarette TaxCorporate Income TaxDog License TaxFederal Income TaxFederal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)Fishing License TaxFood License TaxFuel Permit TaxGasoline TaxHunting License TaxInheritance TaxInventory TaxIRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax),IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax),Liquor Tax,Luxury Tax,Marriage License Tax,Medicare Tax,Property Tax,Real Estate Tax,Service charge taxes,Social Security Tax,Road Usage Tax (Truckers),Sales Taxes,Recreational Vehicle Tax,School Tax,State Income Tax,State Unemployment Tax (SUTA),Telephone Federal Excise Tax,Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax,Telephone
 Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax,Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax,Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax,Telephone State and Local Tax,Telephone Usage Charge Tax,Utility Tax,Vehicle License Registration Tax,Vehicle Sales Tax,Watercraft Registration Tax,Well Permit Tax,Workers Compensation Tax.COMMENTS: Not one of these taxes existed 100 years agoAnd there was prosperity, absolutely no national debt,The largest middle class in the world and Mom stayed hometo raise the kids.What the hell happened ?Garance  Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.  
		Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2ยข/min or less.
__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Independent broker dealer
  
  
Independent director
  
  
Central intelligence agency
  
  


Central intelligence agency employment
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual 

[cia-drugs] Fwd: [ctrl] Trauma Programming

2006-10-02 Thread RoadsEnd


Begin forwarded message:From: "citizensmileycoyote" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: October 2, 2006 4:28:27 PM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ctrl] Trauma ProgrammingReply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://destabilize.blogspot.com/2006/09/micromanaging-shock-awe-to-create-deep.htmlMicromanaging Shock  Awe to create "Deep Psychological Injury""While it may have appeared to American T.V. viewers that 'Shock and Awe' was merely a catchy media label for the U.S. bombing campaign in Iraq, its actual origins, and a whole theory of warfare, are found in a 1996 advisory report published by the National Defense University. Authored by Harlan Ullman of the National War College, it argues that the aim of modern warfare is not merely to achieve military victory but also, by means of sheer intimidation, to inflict a deep psychological injury, to scare and terrorize potential rivals into submission. It is, in effect, the practical application of the Wolfowitz Doctrine of global domination through force. Describing 'Shock and Awe' as 'massively destructive strikes directly at the public will,' Ullman writes, '... intimidation and compliance are the outputs we seek to obtain ... The intent here is to impose a regime of Shock and Awe through delivery of instant, nearly incomprehensible levels of massive destruction directed at influencing society writ large ... through very selective, utterly brutal and ruthless, and rapid application of force to intimidate,' Ullman continues, '... The aim ... is to affect the will, perception, and understanding of the adversary ... Without senses, the adversary becomes impotent and entirely vulnerable.'"More here: Shock  Awe Revisited
__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Independent broker dealer
  
  
Independent director
  
  
Central intelligence agency
  
  


Central intelligence agency employment
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___
=