http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/price-of-gold-4/2007/05/16/

How the U.S. Govt. Is Keeping the Price of Gold Artificially Low 
Posted by James Turk on May 16th, 2007 
We have a battle on our hands. It's the battle for the price of gold to reach 
$700, and it is just the latest clash in a long war being fought between gold 
and its perennial antagonist - the gold cartel.

I feel like an old soldier, having already endured so many of these battles. 
They happen because gold is undervalued, which means that it is being exchanged 
for dollars at too cheap a price. So gold tries to correct this imbalance in a 
normal market response by climbing higher, but is prevented from doing so by 
the gold cartel. It is these confrontations that have led to the recurring 
battles.

I think we can learn from these head-to-head clashes. There are lessons from 
the past that can be disheartening at times like this when the gold price gets 
repeatedly repelled from $700. It is important to recognize that every time 
gold and the cartel have battled in the past, gold eventually won.


For example, back in March 2001, I wrote the following about the Battle for 
$272:

  "Open interest on Comex calls in the last few days has risen by 16,000 
contracts. That's 1.6 million ounces, or nearly 50 tonnes. Who would be willing 
to take the risk of selling these calls with gold so cheap? Probably the same 
central banks who have been manipulating the price. They are still trying to 
keep the gold price under their thumb. Will they succeed yet again? There's the 
rub. No one knows. The markets may be getting ready to 'throw away the key', 
but maybe not. While we know that gold is unbelievably cheap and eventually 
going higher, we just don't know when.

  "Watch the $272 level. Gold probed that level today, but backed off, though 
still closed up over $5 on the day. If $272 is hurdled, the long awaited rally 
may be finally underway. And it also may be the rally in which those who have 
been manipulating the gold price are finally forced to throw in the towel, just 
as they were forced to do so the last time the price of gold was being 
manipulated, which was in 1971."

The price of gold eventually broke through the lines the gold cartel had 
mobilized at $272, and climbed higher. But the gold cartel staged a retreat, 
and eventually we got the War for $325. So significant was $325 that I wrote 
the following in March 2002

  "If you are old enough to remember when President Nixon closed the 'Gold 
Window' on August 15, 1971, you have an advantage over those who did not 
experience that event and the subsequent rise in the gold price. We are at, I 
believe. a similar moment in time. Maybe we are only at the equivalent of 
January 1971, or perhaps as close as August 1, 1971. We just don't know for 
sure how close we are to the launch date, but the important point is that the 
launch date is indeed coming."

It took another 6 months, but $325 was indeed hurdled, on December 6, 2002. So 
important was that battle that I continued to write about $325 for months. For 
example, I penned the following in February 2003:

  "For the past six years of this 20-plus-year consolidation, gold traded under 
$325. During this period gold moved out from weak hands into the strong hands 
that were accumulating it at those bargain basement levels. To make that base 
even more convincing and technically significant, we had a selling climax in 
the middle of that base when gold was dumped after the Bank of England 
announcement, causing it to reach a low of $252 in July 1999. As the BoE began 
its dishoarding, those who recognized that gold was undervalued (us included) 
were buying while the BoE was selling.

  "Then with the breakout above $325, gold's base was firmly in place. This 
base defines the bottom in gold prices. Time will tell of course, but I don't 
think we'll ever see those prices again. Just as gold never looked back when it 
started its final break away from $35 in the early 1970's, gold is again not 
looking back. $325, $330, $340 and probably even $350 - those gold prices are 
history and won't be seen again. Again, only time will tell, but my scenario 
from here is quite clear.

  "Because gold is moving higher from such historically undervalued levels and 
because so many people have been left standing on the platform when the 
gold-train started pulling away from the station with the break above $325, it 
is onward and upward for gold from here."

And so it was. But then came the battles for $420, $450, $500, and since last 
May, we have been fighting the Battle for $700. Gold will win this time too, 
but again, we are frustrated and irritated that there is even a battle at all.

Who is the gold cartel? And what are they trying to accomplish? The gold cartel 
is an alliance of governments and a few bullion banks. This group is led by the 
U.S. government. Though their aims are different, their congruent interests put 
them on the same side. Here's what they are trying to do.

The US government wants the US dollar to continue as the world's reserve 
currency. But the dollar is no longer worthy of holding this privileged 
position. It is not sound money that can be used reliably in international 
commerce. It is being inflated and debased, which are actions that erode its 
usefulness as currency. It is also being used as a political tool, which again 
makes it unreliable money for cross-border commerce.

So the US government has a problem. Gold has always held the position of 
international money, and currencies only became reserve currencies because they 
were "as good as gold", which is what the dollar used to be. Now, however, gold 
and the dollar are competitors, with the result that a rising gold price shows 
how badly the dollar is being managed. This reality decreases the demand for 
the dollar, making it more difficult for it to remain unchallenged as the 
world's reserve currency.

Consequently, the US government wants a low gold price to make the dollar look 
good. Its strategists believe that a low gold price will make people think the 
dollar is being well managed, which obviously is a necessary precondition for 
anyone to continue using it. After all, if people truly understood how 
vulnerable the dollar is to a collapse, the demand for the dollar would decline 
even more rapidly than it is already declining.

Most other governments within the US orbit work toward the same objective. 
Though they may be envious of the dollar's privileged position, in the end they 
accept it because these other governments are also fiat money advocates. By 
keeping the dollar-monetary system functioning, they can also perpetuate the 
myth of fiat money by creating their own currencies 'out of thin air', thereby 
enabling these governments to do what all governments want, namely, to use 
newly created fiat currency to preserve their own position of privilege and 
power.

Their aims are clear, but governments don't directly trade in the gold market. 
They enlist the help of the bullion banks, but not all of them of course, just 
the 2 or 3 largest ones in order to keep the cabal as small as possible. After 
all, the bullion banks stand to make fortunes by working with the government, 
and they obviously don't want to spread this profit around needlessly to other 
banks that are not needed in the price manipulation scheme.

The bullion banks make money in two ways. First, they earn the contango. In 
other words, by being short at all times, they earn the interest income 
available from gold. It works like this.

Because gold is money, its future contracts always trade at a higher price than 
the spot gold price. This is called contango, and is the opposite of every 
other commodity. Because they are not money, other commodities trade in 
backwardation, meaning their future contracts always trade below the spot 
price, except in abnormal circumstances, for example, where supply is disrupted 
by an unforeseen event.

So by being short the contango, bullion banks are always selling gold for 
future delivery above the spot price. If the spot price is unchanged or lower 
when those future commitments come due, the bullion banks make money on the 
difference between the price at which they sold and the spot price on the due 
date. But if the spot price is higher, they lose money, so clearly the bullion 
banks do not want a rising gold price.

The second way bullion banks make money is by what I call "picking the market's 
pockets". There are a number of ways they do this. For example, because they 
execute the government's trades, they know when large amounts of gold are going 
to be dumped into the market as part of the gold's cabal's price manipulation 
scheme. So the bullion banks "front run" those trades by selling first, and 
then profit from the price slide that occurs when the big government order is 
dumped on the market. So in essence the bullion banks are strapping on a 
feed-bag by working with the government.

It can be discouraging when viewing this state of affairs. However, we should 
instead focus on the important parts, which are that gold is in a bull market 
that is now more than six years old and that notwithstanding this fact, gold 
remains undervalued. Or to put it another way, the dollar is overvalued.

Sell the dollar and buy gold because the Battle for $700 will end the same way 
the other battles have ended; gold will win the battle. The gold cartel is 
losing the war. In the end, the market is bigger than the government.

Regards,

James Turk
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Note: James Turk is the Founder and Chairman of GoldMoney.com. Since 2001, 
thousands of individuals and companies have used GoldMoney® to buy gold to 
protect their wealth from today's financial uncertainties.

P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail 
newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS 
feed.

Related Posts:


a.. A Krugerrand or Two 
a.. The Price of Gold, Inflation & Deflation 
a.. Gold or Currency. Which Would You Rather Hold?


  a.. Gold , U.S. Dollar 
  b.. 
Permy: http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/price-of-gold-4/2007/05/16/

Reply via email to