Re: [cia-drugs] Re: Hopsicker on the controlled demolition theorists

2006-12-17 Thread RoadsEnd
Dan, is a grown man, and last I looked allowed to think and say what he wants. As far as I am concerned it makes no difference to me what he thinks, I have spoken to Daniel many times about my beliefs and he allows that I may be right. Daniel, when we first met, thought much of what I say

[cia-drugs] Re: Hopsicker on the controlled demolition theorists

2006-12-16 Thread mark urban
If daniel does not see that WTC7 was controlled demolition, then he can go f##k himself. WTC1 and 2 collapsed faster than the rate at which a free falling object would cover the same distance. You cannot get that result without a lot of help; that help cannot be in the form of low temperature

Re: [cia-drugs] Re: Hopsicker on the controlled demolition theorists

2006-12-16 Thread RoadsEnd
Sometime folks see the dialectic, sometimes they step right into it. Peace, K On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:55 AM, mark urban wrote: If daniel does not see that WTC7 was controlled demolition, then he can go f##k himself. WTC1 and 2 collapsed faster than the rate at which a free falling object

[cia-drugs] Re: Hopsicker on the controlled demolition theorists

2006-12-16 Thread mark urban
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVzQfa_V1jw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVzQfa_V1jw --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometime folks see the dialectic, sometimes they step right into it. Peace, K On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:55 AM, mark urban wrote: If