Peace is not in the game plan. War remains the game plan. Keep that in mind all 
you multi-cultural NATO-ers. Invasiveness (translation: invasion) is key.

SPECIES CONTROL: D.C. -STYLE

By Nancy Levant
May 16, 2009


The control freaks in D.C. have a new idea. We, the rabble, are no longer to 
have birds, snakes, fish, guinea pigs, and other "non-native" critters as our 
pets of choice. I refer you to H.R. 669. Equally, other control mongers have 
stated that the domestic cat is no longer to be allowed as our pet due to its 
vicious attacks upon wild birds. Hmmm - one wonders who kills more animals….the 
Humane Society and PETAA or cats? And do these "humane" organizations eat their 
prey or make boo-coo bucks with their prey?

So, fine - let's talk non-native species. Let's talk Asians of every flavor, 
Caucasians of every flavor, African-Americans, Latinos, Russian-Americans, 
Middle-Easterners, India(n)-Americans, Eskimo/Inuits, and every other 
"American" of every original ancestry. Are we not all non-natives occupying 
American soil that only in recent history belonged solely to Native American 
peoples?

If my guinea pig is an illegal alien terrorist on American soil, and my cat is 
a domestic terrorist in my back yard, are we all not non-native terrorists in 
the former united States? Perhaps we need to manufacture a new island for 
American mutts - a place to dump them as the globally invasive species they 
have become. Perhaps we should create a Humane Organization to euthanize all 
non-native humans who have, themselves, become completely and globally invasive.

Is there not something…let us say…hypocritical about ft foreigners calling 
foreigners foreigners on foreign soil? And who decides which species are to be 
eradicated or "relocated" for the good of nature? How sad that nature is such a 
damsel in distress, but how fortunate and marvelous that D.C. is the knight in 
shining armor and the purveyor of omnipotent wisdom of the natural world. Thank 
goodness for politicians.

So, let us therefore go back to the lands of our original descendents. Surely 
mandatory DNA collections and the corporate patenting of human genes will aid 
in this "relocation" process. Let us stop polluting America the Beautiful with 
our occupation of this non-native territory. In fact, let us make all of the 
North American continent a Biosphere Reserve solely for nature's chipped 
animals, and let's get serious about non-native corruption. Let us think only 
in terms of pure naturalism and natural utopia. Perhaps only pure-bred people 
should exist. Perhaps "multi-culturalism" is non-native by definition. Are we 
not, as human beings, a species, and are not above nor below the level of other 
animals? Are we non-native terrorists that should only exist in the lands of 
our original origin?

As the genetically mixed mutts of America, where exactly do we belong? If a 
guinea, born in America, is a terrorist non-native and illegal alien, and a 
domestic cat terrorist, killer of birds, and who I assume is of Egyptian 
ancestry, cannot be an American cat - even though it was born to American cat 
parents, grand-parents, and great grand-parents - then how can any immigrant of 
any species be permitted to pollute American soil?

It's a funny thing how time passes and changes perception. In ancient Egypt, 
cats were revered because they killed other species. Today, they are domestic 
terrorists because they kill other species. This used to be called a food 
chain. And, a guinea pig, an imported laboratory research animal who has been 
the target of real corporate abuse for decades, is now an illegal alien if it 
is loved and cared for by a family.

Perhaps the eco-freaks are right. Mankind is simply the bane of nature's 
existence and too stupid to exist. Perhaps everything should be eliminated or 
"reduced" minus the D.C.-ers who obviously are the moral aristocrats of the 
human race and so full of inherent wisdom and honesty that they simply intuit 
that guinea pigs must go. Surely they must make them illegal species. They 
simply must pass another law!

Now, with such silliness aside, such D.C. B.S. arguments fall flat as they tend 
to do - dialectically speaking. Sorry, folks, but globalism is the very 
antithesis, or shall we say dialectic, of non-native arguments. The pinnacle of 
this D.C. contradiction is global invasiveness - the kingpin of invasiveness. 
Perhaps "governance" is the invasive species that must go. Perhaps we, the 
people, should make a few laws, too.

And one must wonder if the actual reason for H.R. 669 and other such garbage is 
the problematic reality of the sheer numbers of pets kept by the American 
people. When "relocation into human settlements" is in the game plan, perhaps 
pets present a problem to all relocating purposes and intents. In our existing 
and multiple "states of emergency," martial laws (many of them) and 
relocate-able/mobile civilian work forces/details/national-universal servants - 
so declared by martial laws - multi-millions of pets take on whole new 
problematic (and dialectic) meaning - much like all non-native-isms. 

As the world continues to observe the world falling apart - ethnically, 
politically, economically, religiously, and familial-ly, perhaps invasiveness, 
or shall we say enforced multi-culturalism, is the plan. However, the plan 
seems to be creating global messes that somehow keep funneling the world's 
wealth and land masses into the hands of governors and CEOs. Perhaps the 
forced-mixing of the world's people produces perfect problems, which allow for 
"global" intrusions and world-wide control of the world's people and, more 
importantly, the lands upon which they stand.

Peace is not in the game plan. War remains the game plan. Keep that in mind all 
you multi-cultural NATO-ers. Invasiveness (translation: invasion) is key. And 
it surely appears, and with all things considered, that it is America's turn to 
take the pounding. It seems to be our turn, globally speaking, to take a highly 
controlled governmental beating.


So, semi-diversionary tactics continue to rule our days. Take H.R. 669, for 
instance. This is a beauty of a dialectical trick, and it's actually hilarious 
by virtue of its transparency. For the ten-thousandth time - Agenda 21 states 
that human populations are to be relocated.


It just goes to show you how insane it has all become. This is exactly what it 
has come to. Keep fighting all you democrats and republicans. Keep playing the 
parts the tell-a-vision expects you to play. Emergency! Emergency! Emergencies 
around every corner - just like vicious killer cats. If I were you, I'd be far 
more worried about global population reduction strategies. 



Please join Nancy Levant and Darren Weeks every Saturday morning, 8:00 A.M.. to 
11:00 A.M. (EST), on the Republic Broadcasting Network talk radio program 
"Govern America." Saturday, May 16 guest: patriot radio icon Chris Gerner. 
Click here to listen live.

© 2009 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserve 



Nancy Levant is a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American 
culture. She is the author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The 
Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful 
timing).

She is an opponent of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance 
by deception, political feminism, the public school system, political economics 
based upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal 
Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality. To book 
an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to:

Not available

http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy130.htm

Reply via email to