Yes, Lieberman is despicable, but so is Ned Lamont. The Illuminati control both sides; that's why they always win and we always LOSE. This is why my work exists; I'm tired of losing, and I'll bet you are too.
Peace, Arlene Johnson Publisher/Author http://www.truedemocracy.net Click on Magazine to access my e-zine. Password for 2006 editions: message No password is needed to previous editions. -----Original Message----- >From: Vigilius Haufniensis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 12, 2006 10:12 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [cia-drugs] With the Lieberman Defeat, Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed > >http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/3333lieberman_dlc_down.html > > With the Lieberman Defeat, > Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed > by Nancy Spannaus > > The defeat of the leading Republican Bush-lover in the Democratic Party, > Joe Lieberman, in the Senate Democratic primary in Connecticut on Aug. 8, has > thrown a huge monkeywrench into the efforts of the Felix Rohatyn-funded > Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to stage a comeback in the runup to the > November Congressional elections. The field is now wide open for the > Democrats to turn to Lyndon LaRouche's leadership, especially as LaRouche has > been the spearhead of the anti-Lieberman drive. Any other course is going to > lead, quite predictably, to a smashing Democratic defeat in November. > > LaRouche representatives in Washington, D.C. are already receiving > congratulations on the Lieberman defeat, much as they did when leading > Republican thug Tom DeLay of Texas was knocked out of politics. The real > question is: Do the Democrats have the guts to follow up? > > Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), one of the many leading > Democrats who had endorsed Lieberman prior to the primary, responded to the > election result with his most feisty comments in months. According to the > Aug. 10 Boston Globe, Reid said: "But the perception was that he was too > close to George Bush, and this election was, in many respects, a referendum > on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for > Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new > direction." Reid said polls show Democrats winning Republican-held Senate > seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Missouri, and Rhode Island. > > "A lot of time has gone by and the numbers haven't changed. In > actuality, Ohio has gotten better. Montana has gotten better. And now we have > three other seats we are looking at. We were only looking also at Tennessee > and Arizona. Now we've added Virginia to the mix." Reid said. > > Out of the eight Republican seats Reid mentioned, the Democrats need to > win six, in order to take control of the Senate. > > The Lieberman Stink > Lieberman's loss is a direct reflection of the fact that the Connecticut > electorate saw him as the "kissing cousin" of George W. Bush. Like the > majority of the nation, Connecticut voters are in revulsion against the > brutal, no-win war in Iraq, and the complete lack of action by the current > Administration and Congress on the accelerating economic and financial > collapse. Challenger Ned Lamont's anti-war campaign was a plus for him, but > Lieberman's negatives far outweighed them. Washington sources tell EIR that > when Lieberman began to threaten the party that he would campaign as an > Independent if he lost the primary, he pushed many over the edge, against him. > > Lieberman comes by his thug-like behavior naturally. As LaRouche's EIR > exposed in a series of mass-run offprints back in August 2002, Lieberman got > his start in the Senate with the full backing of some of the most notorious > right-wing fascist circles on the planet, including avowed Carlist William F. > Buckley. Buckley not only waged a propaganda campaign against Lieberman's > opponent, Lowell Weicker, in the Senate race of 1988, but bailed Lieberman > out financially by steering him to the Cuban exile community in Miami. > Lieberman maintained the close connections with the Cuban right wing, at > least up through the 2000 Presidential election, when he was known as "Gore's > Man in Little Havana." (See "Fascist William Buckley Put Joe Lieberman in the > Senate," EIR, July 26, 2002.) > > Then there are Lieberman's mob connections, starting with Michael > Steinhardt, the chairman and bankroller of the DLC when it was launched out > of Pam Harriman's "Democrats for the 80s" late in that decade. Steinhardt, > the son of the leading jewel fence for the Meyer Lansky syndicate, ran one of > the filthiest hedge funds on Wall Street during the 1980s and 1990s. After he > shut down his hedge fund in the wake of his company being involved in a scam > over Treasury bonds, Steinhardt emerged as a major player in the Edgar > Bronfman-founded Mega Group. > > Steinhardt, who now funds the neo-con New York Sun newspaper, has > continued to be close to Lieberman. The two collaborated in the infamous > September 1998 effort to carry out a coup d'�tat against the Clinton > Administration, by trying to get President Clinton to resign in the wake of > the Monica Lewinsky affair. Indeed, Lieberman is known in some Washington > political circles as the "Senator from Mega," a testament to his closeness to > the circles of Bronfman and Steinhardt. > > Indeed, Lieberman, and his close colleague John McCain, teamed up in > 2002 to demand that President Bush launch an attack on Iraq, and providing > political cover for the Cheney-controlled apparatus of hoked-up intelligence > which was used to intimidate the Senate into approving the ongoing disastrous > war. (See "Knock Out Lieberman and McCain To Save the Republic," EIR, Aug. 2, > 2002.) > > Will Cheney's Support Help? > Lieberman's immediate announcement that he would run as an Independent > against Lamont (who won the primary by a respectable margin of 52 to 48%), > has brought him a wave of support-from Cheneyac Republicans. None other than > Cheney himself came forward to complain about the Democrats having "purged" > their party, and to assert that Lieberman's defeat would benefit "al-Qaeda > types." > > While Cheney denied that the White House is actually supporting > Lieberman in his "independent" Senate bid, it's probably true. Cheney lies. > > There have been reports from a Lieberman aide, coming through journalist > George Stephanopoulos, that Karl Rove, Bush's master election strategist, has > told Lieberman that he would help him in any way he could. Rove would only > confirm that he called to congratulate Lieberman, but at least one Republican > Senate candidate, Mark Kennedy of Minnesota, has declared that he will > support him. > > For his part, Connecticut Democratic nominee Ned Lamont responded to > Lieberman's attack on him for being "soft on terror" by saying: "Wow, that > comment sounds an awful lot like Vice President Cheney's comment on > Wednesday. Both of them believe our invasion of Iraq has a lot to do with > 9/11. That's a false premise." > > Moving Toward a Solution > For the Democrats to prevail nationally, however, it will not be enough > to just attack the war, or even Cheney and the pro-war synarchist agents > inside the Democratic Party. The electorate is in a white-hot rage against > the inaction of the Congress, particularly on life-and-death questions of > economics, such as the shutdown of the auto industry. Even more damning is > the fact that LaRouche has put the solution to the crisis on the table-only > to be shunned and ignored, while the Democrats concentrate on getting support > from DLC moneybags like Felix Rohatyn. > > The LaRouche Youth Movement is concentrating on getting this message > out: Are you going to act on LaRouche's program, or are you going to continue > to be corrupted and bribed by Rohatyn et al.'s money? Not only political > careers are at stake. This is a matter of the survival of the United States. > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
