[cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253

2008-09-24 Thread Richard Guthrie
Andrew/Stefan, I have completed my research with regard to your question regarding what value LSA would return in the case that the domain functional level is set to 2003. The value returned is dependent on the OS version of the domain controller responding to the query: If the domain control

[cifs-protocol] RE: Microsoft Client tool expectatations

2008-09-24 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 20:56 -0700, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 14:33 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > The product team is analyzing the network trace for trusted domain > > join problem. We have several questions regarding the test. > > > > (1) What was the exa

[cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition

2008-09-24 Thread Bill Wesse
You are completely welcome - and thank you for *your* persistence! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett

[cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition

2008-09-24 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 08:46 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > Good morning Andrew. > > Per your inquiry concerning elaboration on the objectSid definition, I > am sending you copy of an update to the documentation as shown below > (the second paragraph is new content). Yay! I like it :-) Thanks for yo

[cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition

2008-09-24 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew. Per your inquiry concerning elaboration on the objectSid definition, I am sending you copy of an update to the documentation as shown below (the second paragraph is new content). Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily; if so, I will consider your q