RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: CreateTrustedDomainEX blob incorrect

2008-11-04 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:33 -0800, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > The section of the documentation that I sent you included the > following updated text. It was decided to put this information in > section 2.2.58 because this structure is used by multiple interfaces. > > The incomi

[cifs-protocol] Re: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO

2008-11-04 Thread Adam Simpkins
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:57:00AM -0800, Bill Wesse wrote: > Thank you very much for your considerations. I have filed a > documentation change request against [MS-NLMP] concerning NTLMSSP > InitialContextTokens (see 'Expected' below).. Thanks, Bill. I do have one comment about some of your text

[cifs-protocol] RE: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO

2008-11-04 Thread Bill Wesse
Thank you very much for your considerations. I have filed a documentation change request against [MS-NLMP] concerning NTLMSSP InitialContextTokens (see 'Expected' below).. == Change Comment / Request: The documentation

[cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Correction Assistance Request: DataOffset in WRITE_ANDX request

2008-11-04 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:02:48PM -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > We are looking into your request and the appropriate > contact will get back with you shortly. Any updates here? Thanks, Volker pgpUtoRJDbpDu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cifs-

RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

2008-11-04 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:22 -0800, Obaid Farooqi wrote: > Hi Andrew: > I tried to dig this up but the scope of your question is currently > just too broad. Clearly you know a fishing expedition when you see one. :-) > It would help greatly if you can give a little more information about > the s