Good morning Mr. French. Thank you for reporting the OS and NOS string documentation shortcomings in [MS-SMB2].
I have created case SRX090617600092 for your comments concerning that, and expect to begin work on this later today, or tomorrow morning at the latest. I confirm that a documentation change is currently pending (work in progress) against the raw ('Implicit NTLM') NTLMSSP buffer content. I will be glad to update you when we have the final text ready. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:14 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian In implementing SMB2 Session Setup protocol support I did not notice reference to the "OS" and "NOS" (the strings which name the operating system and network operating system version fields of the client and server) which followed the security blob. See sections 2.2.5 and 2.2.6 of MS-SMB2 and 3.3.5.5. The description of the "buffer" field just notes that it "MUST contain a token as produced by the GSS protocol as specified in section 3.2.5.3" (which would not describe the operating system or network operating system fields). Note that an earlier CAR shows that the description of the buffer field is incorrect in another way (Windows servers accept NTLMSSP, not encapsulated in GSS in the buffer field for SMB2, and in some ways that is easier and safer to generate). -- Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol