Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD)

2009-12-02 Thread Bill Wesse
Hello Tridge - just checking in to see how things are going. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 From: Bill Wesse Sent: Friday, November

Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR: DS_FLAG Option bits (SRX091002600036 [MS-ADTS] 7.3.3.2 DS_FLAG option bits)

2009-12-02 Thread Bill Wesse
Hello Tridge - just checking in to see how things are going. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From: Bill

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

2009-12-02 Thread Obaid Farooqi
Hi Andrew: Just an update. We are still working on this issue and I'll be in touch as soon as I have an answer for you. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Senior Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, November

Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 mixed lock unlock requests in a single SMB_LOCK request

2009-12-02 Thread Steven Danneman
Hongwei, I see the behavior clearly specified in MS-SMB2 3.3.5.14.1. Thanks for your help! -Steven From: Hongwei Sun [mailto:hongw...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:33 PM To: Steven Danneman; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net Subject: RE: SMB2 mixed lock