Hi Andrew, thank you for your question. Someone from the Open Specifications
team will respond to you soon.
Josh Curry | Escalation Engineer | US-CSS Developer Support Core (DSC) Protocol
Team
P +1 469 775 7215
One Microsoft Way, 98052, Redmond, WA, USA http://support.microsoft.com
I have some questions as to what the guarantees in the protocol are as far
as ordering of responses and when those responses occurred.
MS-SMB2: 3.1.5 is clear in that it says there is no processing or sequencing
rules. (If this is the correct part of the document to draw such semantics
from.)
Matthieu,
As per the existing documentation and my code review, the documentation in
3.3.4.2 MS-FRS1 is correct. This value is returned by the server as per
section 3.3.4.2 and it is set to the GUID of local replica identified on the
server by ReplicaSetName, which is one of the input
Steve,
Any update ?
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:26 PM
To: 'Steve French'
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: RE: [REG:111081664438980] RE: [cifs-protocol] Level 257
Hi Hongwei,
On 30/08/2011 21:58, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Matthieu,
As per 2.3.2.2 MS-FRS1, A domain MUST have only one NTFRS replica set
object of type SYSVOL. The fRSReplicaSetType
attribute of a SYSVOL type object MUST be set to 2. Based on this, the FRS
can go through all the NTFRS
Yes, this is right.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:13 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol
Sorry about that - I don't actually have the test machines (I couldn't
find a WindowsCE machine to test with) and the user didn't say what
the test program was - but I think it was the dir command. I will
ask him.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Hongwei Sun hongw...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hello Dochelp,
I have some problems to understand something in the join process related
to VVJOIN.
In paragraph 3.3.4.4.4 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_JOINING we have at the end
After the CMD_JOINED packet is sent:
* If a connection VVJoin needs to be performed, FRS MUST go through the
process
Hi Matthieu, thank you for your question. A member of the protocol
documentation team will be in touch with you soon.
Josh Curry | Escalation Engineer | US-CSS Developer Support Core (DSC) Protocol
Team
P +1 469 775 7215
One Microsoft Way, 98052, Redmond, WA, USA http://support.microsoft.com
We have been looking at DRSUAPI/DsAddEntry, and have a few questions.
We are trying to implement subdomain support in Samba4 before the
plugfest.
We have been able to generate error cases that do not seem to be
'possible' in the docs. Can you please clarify exactly what errors this
function
10 matches
Mail list logo
