Thread for:
SR 113100910848319
[MS-SMB2]Q 2 of 3: Does the client behaviour stated in section 3.2.5.4
(Receiving an SMB2 LOGOFF Response) apply in case of an error as well?
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 9:14 PM
To: 'Shirish Pargaonkar'
Cc: c
Thread for :
SR 113100910848314:
[MS-SMB2] Q 1 of 3: Types of error a server can return in response to a session
logoff request from a client (section 2.2.8).
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 9:14 PM
To: 'Shirish Pargaonkar'
Cc: cifs-proto...@s
Thread for:
SR 113100910848322:
[MS-SMB2] Q 3 of 3: behaviour if the signature verification fails in section
3.2.5.1.3
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 9:14 PM
To: 'Shirish Pargaonkar'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: session logoff req
Shirish,
Thank you for your questions. To track these issues, we created three cases to
track each one separately. Please do not respond to this mail; I will start a
new thread for each. An engineer from the Protocols will contact you soon. The
case numbers are below:
SR 113100910848314:
[M
---
Would like to have a clarification in MS-SMB2 document about the
1) Types of error a server can return in response to a session logoff
request from a client (section 2.2.8).
2) The state of the session and expected client behaviour when a server
returns an error to a session logoff requ
Nadia,
It was nice working with the team at the IO lab. Please find the references and
explanation as follows.
Your observation is correct. The restriction is relevant as specified in
MS-ADTS. The Delete Operation constraints ([MS-ADTS] 3.1.1.5.5) has a clause on
SAM-specific objects.
After rev
---
Would like to have a clarification in MS-SMB2 document about the
1) Types of error a server can return in response to a session logoff
request from a client (section 2.2.8).
2) The state of the session and expected client behaviour when a server
returns an error to a session logoff requ
