On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:42:55PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:01:12 -0600
Christopher R. Hertel c...@samba.org wrote:
Question (for which I do not have an answer): How much work do you want to
do to make their intentionally broken model work?
Very
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 06:22:01PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
Treating different calls differently for timeouts sounds like the road
to special-case madness. It seems to me that the best behavior would be
to have the client wait for a reply indefinitely if the server is
responding to periodic
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:09:39AM +, Bryan Burgin wrote:
Jeremy,
I'm researching this for you. I worked with Guenther on similar
[MS-RPRN]questions during the Samba IO Lab, along with Nick and Tarun from
Microsoft and the Product Group.
The two most detailed debugging techniques
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:54:36PM +, David Wooden wrote:
Sorry for the re-send, adding our internal tool alias for tracking these
issues.
-Original Message-
From: David Wooden
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Jeremy Allison
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto
Dear Dochelp,
In MS-RPRN, section : 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters.
the text reads:
3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters
Unless notified otherwise, methods returning one or more dynamically-typed
values use
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:14:26PM +, Bill Wesse wrote:
Hello Tim. I think the difference in the response between the standard versus
pass-through level lies in how the file handle is obtained during the call
(given that TRANS2_SET_PATH_INFORMATION passes the path, and not the handle).
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:25:57PM +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Jeremy,
After much of testing and debugging, it seems that we are getting the
cause
why Windows takes the file offline and the timestamp update only goes to local
store. When Windows close one particular handle through
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
Can you tell us how you use SMBTorture BASE, RAW and SMB2 test suites in the
Samba project? Is there any documentation that we should use to properly setup
the Samba server in the test?
Well we mainly use it to determine where we're
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:33:14AM -0700, James Peach wrote:
Hi all,
I had some time a couple of months ago, so I knocked up some
documentation for the UNIX extensions.
Although what follows is in RFC format, I doubt that I will get around
to submitting this as a real IETF informational
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Jeremy Allison schrieb:
Yes, that's exactly what I'm coding up right now.
Wait for the check-in :-).
good:-)
Actually, this proved much harder than I thought
and I junked all my client changes last night. I
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:14:48AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
can't we out that logic into the client, so when the client
get the redirect from a server with unix extentions then
it converts the redirect url when he talks to a server without
unix extentions support.
Yes, that's
11 matches
Mail list logo
