Layton'
Cc: Christopher R. Hertel; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
The pcap format of the capture is fine. I am able to open this in Netmon. I
will update you
Jeff Layton wrote:
:
Sounds like a reasonable correction. I will note however that I didn't
actually test Win98 or NT. It's rather difficult to find working media
for them nowadays since they're not available on MSDN (hint, hint).
This capture was done with a win2k8 client. I'll have to take
: Christopher R. Hertel; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:33:56 +
Edgar Olougouna edg...@microsoft.com wrote:
Jeff,
Could you
: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
Just an FYI that I filed a technical document issue on this issue and will
update you as soon we complete our investigation.
I have been researching Windows NT and 2K and passed on my observations
Edgar Olougouna wrote:
:
3) If it waits indefinitely, does it send more than one echo request? If
so, how frequently are they sent?
Answer:
Echo requests are sent only when the connection has been idle for more than
the session timeout. The default session timeout value is 45 seconds in
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:56:17 +
Edgar Olougouna edg...@microsoft.com wrote:
Jeff,
I have been working with the product group on this issue regarding
Windows-based CIFS clients' timeout behavior. Please find the answers as
follows. Let me know whether you need further clarifications. The
: Christopher R. Hertel; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:56:17 +
Edgar Olougouna edg...@microsoft.com wrote:
Jeff,
I have been working
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:08:32 -0600
Christopher R. Hertel c...@samba.org wrote:
[...]
Probably needs two tests. One to see what happens if the (single)
connection is lost, and another to see what happens if a single operation
takes a very, very long time to complete (as you describe).
I
Jeff,
Other than the shutdown in less than 30 seconds, the behavior you're
describing is consistent with what's in the doc.
From the earlier notes, the base timeout value is 45 seconds. That value is
adjusted based upon the various factors. I described some of those in an
earlier e'mail and
[mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:09 PM
To: Jeff Layton
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
Below...
Jeff Layton
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:08:32 -0600
Christopher R. Hertel c...@samba.org wrote:
Below...
[...]
In any case, this may all be a matter of opinion since the spec doesn't
really spell it out. It is of concern however -- it can take a VERY long
time for some reads or writes to complete.
Jeff Layton wrote:
:
Yes, this is probably stretching the definition of protocol
clarification, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask... :)
Not at all.
Keep in mind that I worked with Microsoft to get these docs out, so I know
how important such details are to them, as well as third party
Below...
Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:44:44 -0600
Christopher R. Hertel c...@samba.org wrote:
Jeff Layton wrote:
:
Yes, this is probably stretching the definition of protocol
clarification, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask... :)
Not at all.
Keep in mind that I worked
13 matches
Mail list logo
