Matthieu, It seems that this is not a typo. The COMM_COMMAND is the command to be sent as the result of the processing of CMD_NEED_JOIN. It should be CMD_START_JOIN as indicated in the sentence above. If you look at the next section for " COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_START_JOIN" , you will see the similar thing.
Please let me know if this answers your question. If you see a behavior on wire that is contradictory to the documentation , please share the trace. Thanks! Hongwei -----Original Message----- From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On Behalf Of Matthieu Patou Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:08 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: [cifs-protocol] typo in ms-frs1.pdf ? Hello Dochelp, In paragraph 3.3.4.4.2 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_NEED_JOIN It is said that: "The downstream partner sent CMD_NEED_JOIN to inform the upstream partner that a Join operation is needed (section 3.3.4.6). The upstream partner MUST respond with a CMD_START_JOIN packet. COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_START_JOIN (0x122)." I think there is a typo and the line should be COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_NEED_JOIN (0x121), traces between 2 Windows DCs seems to confirm. Can you confirm too ? Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
