Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129494] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges

2013-01-23 Thread Edgar Olougouna
David, Please find answers as follows: Comment 2) This may imply that the entire chunk must be read and then subsequently written, contrary to Windows Server 2008r2's sub chunk-length (2048 byte) copy behaviour described in the initial report. Perhaps an extra Product Behaviour caveat should be

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129494] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges

2013-01-10 Thread Edgar Olougouna
[Updating subject with new case number 113011010129494] David, Thanks for the feedback. This case will be addressing the remaining comments regarding the update to [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.15.6 Handling a Server-Side Data Copy Request: The remaining two comments: I think the entry stating the destin