On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 06:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
Good morning again - just touching bases with you concerning the ldif dumps
for the display specifiers.
The ldf files have been generated, and work on the licensing agreement is in
progress. As soon as we have, I will provide the ldf
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property
notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and
pertains only to the schema release that we provided (it can be
obtained on the 'Microsoft Open
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:15 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property
notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and
pertains only to the schema release that
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the LDIF!
Can we assume the license on this is the same as for the schema? For
the schema the version we got from MS had the license at the top,
which you can see here:
For the schema license, see this:
You're completely welcome. The notice in the schema is not exactly the same as
what is in our current document postings. For the moment, however, the below
text is the notice I have been advised should apply.
I will ask for additional clarification on this today, since I think it would
be *not
Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property notice.
So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and pertains only to
the schema release that we provided (it can be obtained on the 'Microsoft Open
Specification Support Team Blog' blog at):
Using the
Hi,
We've been having trouble getting AD server administrative tools (such
as the users and computers tool) working correctly when using a Samba
DC. The problem is that we don't have all the entries from the
CN=DisplaySpecifiers,CN=Configuration part of the ldap tree.
To work correctly for
