Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013)

2009-11-18 Thread Bill Wesse
Hello Nadya - here are the results of my investigation. Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily; if so, I will consider your question resolved. Thanks for helping us improve our documentation. If you wish, I will keep the case open until the TDI has been resolved. The

Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013)

2009-11-18 Thread Nadezhda Ivanova
Hi Bill, Thank you, this answers my question. I supposed that the order is indeed irrelevant as long as the offsets are correct, just wanted to double-check because of the explicit ordering in MS-DTYP. Regards, Nadya - Original Message - From: Bill Wesse bil...@microsoft.com To:

Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013)

2009-11-18 Thread Bill Wesse
As always, you are very welcome. Glad to have been of assistance! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From: