Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL

2010-01-14 Thread Bill Wesse
Thanks for the heads up Christopher - you are totally correct in saying my comments on the complexity of NT platform SMB error returns were meant to be 'polite understatements' (especially that pesky flipped response SMB_FLAGS2_NT_STATUS bit, not to mention the 'occasionally optional' WordCount

Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL

2010-01-14 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Bill Wesse wrote: Thanks for the heads up Christopher - you are totally correct in saying my comments on the complexity of NT platform SMB error returns were meant to be 'polite understatements' (especially that pesky flipped response SMB_FLAGS2_NT_STATUS bit, not to mention the 'occasionally