Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD)

2009-12-10 Thread Bill Wesse
Good day Tridge! I have included below the answer I provided on November 13. I will archive the case next Monday (December 14) if I do not hear from you; if necessary, we can reopen the case. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft

Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD)

2009-12-02 Thread Bill Wesse
Hello Tridge - just checking in to see how things are going. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 From: Bill Wesse Sent: Friday, November

[cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD)

2009-11-13 Thread Bill Wesse
Hello Tridge. Here is what I have (pending the proposed changes for [MS-ADTS]: The length of a delete-mangled RDN may indeed exceed rangeUpper, due to the additional delete-mangle decoration. I should first note that the delete-mangled RDN format contains a '\0A' character - not a '\0'.