Good morning Tridge! Since Hongwei is out of the office, I have created case SRX091112600056 to track our work against your question about rDN size / deleted object rDN.
I expect to be able to begin work on this tomorrow, and will keep you updated! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Hongwei Sun Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:56 PM To: 'tri...@samba.org' Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; h...@highlandsun.com; Edgar Olougouna; Sebastian Canevari Subject: RE: limits on rDN size in AD ? Tridge, The RDN of Deleted Objects container is a little different from the normal RDN. The following information in MS-ADTS 3.1.1.5.5 describes the composition of RDN for objects in Deleted Object container: "The RDN of the object is changed to a "delete-mangled RDN"-an RDN that is guaranteed to be unique within the Deleted Objects container. If O is the object that is deleted, the delete-mangled RDN is the concatenation of O!name, the character with value 0x0A, the string "DEL:", and the dashed string representation ([RFC4122] section 3) of O!objectGUID." It looks like to me that for the Delete Objects container, the size constraint should be dependent on the combination of the each sub component. Since I am out of office, I will ask one of my team member to investigate and confirm the behavior. Thanks ! -----Original Message----- From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 6:58 PM To: Hongwei Sun Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; h...@highlandsun.com Subject: RE: limits on rDN size in AD ? Hi Hongwei, We're back to the old question of rDN size limits again! I just got a DRS replication reply from w2k8-r2 with a CN that has a length larger than 64. So I suspect that things are a bit more complex than what we'd discussed before. The object was: CN=89532b80-09fe-445e-afef-965c0d7f7d15\0ADEL:462902b4-1824-4f02-8956-9f934f64fa01,CN=Deleted Objects,CN=Configuration,DC=vsofs8,DC=com which gives a length of 80. Are we perhaps supposed to interpret the \0 as a termination character for the purposes of this length constraint? (note that this is a \ followed by a 0, not a nul byte). Or perhaps deleted objects are special in their constraints in some way? Cheers, Tridge
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
