RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:36 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Andrew, > > >> Andrew, > >> > >>Does this mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ? > > >Correct. However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue. > > Could you explain a little bit more about this ? If you put >

RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

2008-09-23 Thread Hongwei Sun
Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:22 PM To: Hongwei Sun Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:

RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

2008-09-22 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Andrew, > >Does this mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ? Correct. However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue. > Can you give us some clarification at your earliest convenience ? > The only information

RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

2008-09-22 Thread Hongwei Sun
Andrew, Does this mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ? Can you give us some clarification at your earliest convenience ? The only information I have been using for my investigation is winxp-aduc-fail.cap attached in your original e-mail ? Is it still relevant ? Thanks