Re: [cifs-protocol] DirSync ACLs and Deleted Objects - TrackingID#2310230040015878

2023-10-29 Thread Andrew Bartlett via cifs-protocol
> Do you mean "whether an object is returned or not"? Yes. To expand further: In DirSync as described the behaviour is that a deleted object only returns the GUID and deletion state. What I mean by a filter attack is that because not all Deleted objects are returned, only those that match the

Re: [cifs-protocol] DirSync ACLs and Deleted Objects - TrackingID#2310230040015878

2023-10-27 Thread Obaid Farooqi via cifs-protocol
Hi Andrew: I'll help you with this issue. I need a little clarification. I did not understand what you have in the following sentence between dashes: "They are stripped of most information, but a filter attack (eg search for CN=a*) can be used to discover the values - an object is returned nor

[cifs-protocol] DirSync ACLs and Deleted Objects - TrackingID#2310230040015878

2023-10-23 Thread Obaid Farooqi via cifs-protocol
Hi Andrew: Thanks for contacting Microsoft. I have created a case to track this issue. A member of the open specifications team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 4:15 PM