Re: [Cin] Stupid question about pixel conversions in CinGG (xfer functions)

В сообщении от Wednesday 19 February 2020 18:54:38 Good Guy написал(а): > yes this looks like it could be good. However, I am just one coder. > This could take quite some time. It is true that a lot of the calculations > in the xfer setup are not the most optimal (BC_CModel et al) but these >

Re: [Cin] Stupid question about pixel conversions in CinGG (xfer functions)

yes this looks like it could be good. However, I am just one coder. This could take quite some time. It is true that a lot of the calculations in the xfer setup are not the most optimal (BC_CModel et al) but these are more to ensure consistency, not speed. The bulk of the time is spent

[Cin] Stupid question about pixel conversions in CinGG (xfer functions)

Hi, all! I was looking again at https://git.cinelerra-gg.org/git/?p=goodguy/cinelerra.git;a=blob;f=cinelerra-5.1/guicast/bcxfer.C;h=8eb6533baa68b7cc8b3fe1d763f03d65a3d28b4e;hb=HEAD and I think it works (via generated functions from guicast/xfer) by doing pixel-at-a-time, with slices done at