Re: [Cin] can we push 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch early?
Checked into GIT. Tested on 32-bit Debian 9.1 just to be sure and includes the following: 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch 0016-freebsd-in-file.C.patch 0014-freebsd-defines-in-guicast-bcresources.C.patch 0016-freebsd-in-file.C.patch 0017-freebsd-in-dvdcreate.C.patch 0019-disable-frei0r-and-libvmaf-for-freebsd-13-dynamic-ff.patch On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > It needed on NetBSD (i need one more patch rel. to netbsd.patch I made > earlier, but I hope to check it first on Freebsd..) -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] can we push 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch early?
I think I only added two new patches - one workarounding thd encode having ghost 0ch stream and second adding netbsd-specific ifdefs.. if things work for you as-is - hopefully with time and testing pile will shrink) PS: you can look into disabling jasper for opencv On Wednesday, May 4, 2022, Andrea paz wrote: > Can you tell me which patches to remove and which to add from megapile_12? > -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] can we push 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch early?
Can you tell me which patches to remove and which to add from megapile_12? -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] can we push 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch early?
On Wednesday, May 4, 2022, Phyllis Smith wrote: > Tough call -- I really need to check this out and understand it better. > But if someone else can, I would appreciate the help. > I will finish what I am currently testing - 0004, 0015, 0005-0008, > 0011-0013, 0042 - which should not take much longer and then look at 0009 > again. > thanks! it should be the same as first part of https://github.com/manuvi/cinelerra/commit/fd18893b07b943b175664549b26ad6865751d48d just replacing openexr specific types with standard one... should be compatible with both openexr2 and 3 (for our use-case) > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < > randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It needed on NetBSD (i need one more patch rel. to netbsd.patch I made >> earlier, but I hope to check it first on Freebsd..) > > -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] can we push 0009-fileexr-forward-port-openexr-3.patch early?
Tough call -- I really need to check this out and understand it better. But if someone else can, I would appreciate the help. I will finish what I am currently testing - 0004, 0015, 0005-0008, 0011-0013, 0042 - which should not take much longer and then look at 0009 again. On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > It needed on NetBSD (i need one more patch rel. to netbsd.patch I made > earlier, but I hope to check it first on Freebsd..) -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
