Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:17 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> > I never felt comfortable with the public logging. IRC is meant to be a
> > volatile place where humans meet and talk, this is also a social part of
> > the community, you wouldn't like either if your pub-talks are logged
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:17 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> I never felt comfortable with the public logging. IRC is meant to be a
> volatile place where humans meet and talk, this is also a social part of
> the community, you wouldn't like either if your pub-talks are logged,
> even if you meet
David McNab wrote:
>
> As Cobra has expressed, there's a conflict between these purposes, with
> developers logging #cinelerra and using that to keep up to date with
> development issues, while others (including myself, guilty as charged)
> have also been using it for general interactions within t
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:17 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> * Things will be on google for eternity, one has to fear that things he
> saied could be misinterpreted out of context.
And nobody wants to end up like this guy (humorous link):
http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df9601/df960124.jpg
David McNab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At present, there's only one Cinelerra-related channel on IRC, which is
> serving multiple purposes as development discussion, help and general
> chat.
>
> As Cobra has expressed, there's a conflict between these purposes, with
> developers logging #cinelerra and
Hi all,
At present, there's only one Cinelerra-related channel on IRC, which is
serving multiple purposes as development discussion, help and general
chat.
As Cobra has expressed, there's a conflict between these purposes, with
developers logging #cinelerra and using that to keep up to date with
