Scott C. Frase wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 20:27 +0100, Christian Thaeter wrote:
Cinelerra has some race problems between threads which let them wait on
each other doing nothing, this is hard to fix unfortunally. But
generally I think adding more CPU's will add some performance
improvement.
Imo waste of time, I know some of the code and (see condition.C) it
might be evolved due workaround problems in early linuxthread
implementations but it is horribly ugly and broken by design. In a
experimental branch I started to add my 'NoBug' library with a
resource/deadlock checker to
Hi all,
Just to carry on with my initial post regarding hardware.
Considering that I just need power to render, not for editing (which
seems to trigger the problem with multi cpus), I always thought that
getting a rendering farm of PS3 could be smart ?
I am most probably not aware of potential
E Chalaron wrote:
Hi all,
Just to carry on with my initial post regarding hardware.
Considering that I just need power to render, not for editing (which
seems to trigger the problem with multi cpus), I always thought that
getting a rendering farm of PS3 could be smart ?
I am most probably
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 11:45 -0600, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
Your disk performance may be holding you back as well. On the oil
effect, you are CPU bound, on a faster effect (e.g. grayscale) you
will be primarily IO bound. Here's an example. Only recently (in the
past 3 years) has Discreet moved
Scott C. Frase wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 11:45 -0600, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
Your disk performance may be holding you back as well. On the oil
effect, you are CPU bound, on a faster effect (e.g. grayscale) you
will be primarily IO bound. Here's an example. Only recently (in the
past 3
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 20:27 +0100, Christian Thaeter wrote:
Cinelerra has some race problems between threads which let them wait on
each other doing nothing, this is hard to fix unfortunally. But
generally I think adding more CPU's will add some performance
improvement. While in doubt, you may
Hello
Just wondering about a config for a new machine.
With the quad cores coming up I am wondering if I should invest in an
average quad core or a good duo, being tied to a budget.
Basically my question is
would a FBS 1333 with a duo core 3Ghz be faster than a 2.4 Ghz quad
core 1066 FBS, all
Hi E,
My opinions are based upon only twenty-four hours of real editing time,
so I haven't had the chance to test all of Cinelerra's effects, but I'll
give you a quick summary of my impressions.
I bought a Dell SC1430, 64-bit Intel dual quad core running at 1.6Ghz.
Since Cinelerra is optimized
Your disk performance may be holding you back as well. On the oil
effect, you are CPU bound, on a faster effect (e.g. grayscale) you
will be primarily IO bound. Here's an example. Only recently (in the
past 3 years) has Discreet moved to x86. Before that they were selling
their highest end product
10 matches
Mail list logo
