I thought of one workaround but I don't know if it would work. Use a
loopback interface. Perhaps OSPF would use the address in a way that would
meet your needs. Then, would IOS let you say that the HSRP address is the
loopback address also?? That's the part that I don't have time to test.
It may
Gil Shulman wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I know that I asked this question in the past, but I still have
> some problem
> with this issue.
> What I am trying to do is as follows:
>
>Site A|
> Site B
>
> ___
My XYPLEX MAXserver 1600 Terminal Server config notes.
This is alot of peices I have pulled together to get my Maxserver 1600
(16port) working for my CCIE LAB rack. Since the Terminal server is not part
of the lab I need to spend my money on thing like ISDN
hardware. I was not able to find any in
Looking for a CCNP level instructor in the Des Moines Area.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50634&t=50634
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct a
Timothy,
I don't think you will be able to form a neighbor relationship through the
tunnel with that configuration. What I would do is put the tunnel interface
on both sides in the same network rather than using unnumbered. Also, you
would need to add the tunnel network into the OSPF process in
Dear Magdy,
I don't think the upgrade to ACS 3.0 will solve the problem since i'm using
version 3.0 of ACS but have the same problem you have "problem no. 1"
plz any one have comment for that ?
Thanks
""Magdy H. Ibrahim"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi al
Thanks for your response.
I mean when i get authenticated through PIX to out side , where PIX
configured to send AAA to ACS 3.0, the Current Usage remian zero either the
time or the number of sessions, as follow :
Current Usage
Day Week Month Absolute
Online time 00:00 00:00 00:00
In a network where FE/GE are used as direct connects between routers
(with a /30 mask), is there any issue from a network or OSPF perspective
if
- one numbers these links with a /31 network in order to save two IPs
per link.
- one uses the ip ospf network point-to-point command remove the need
Your hosts use HSRP, to set the HOST ip default to the HSRP virtual
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50628&t=50626
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
Thanks for each of your responses.
JackJack Lane wrote:
>
> I don't care about a SmartNet contract. Will a standard,
> fast-page with parity SIMM chip work with a 2500 series
> router? Am I asking for trouble if I don't get a "for Cisco
> 2500 series" ram?
>
> I found this chip for $6: 16 MB
Hi all,
I know that I asked this question in the past, but I still have some problem
with this issue.
What I am trying to do is as follows:
Site A|
Site B
__802.1q
_
Hi all,
I have ACS2.6 server runs on W2k server used to authenticate my dialup users
when they connect to the internet..
few days ago, it started a strange behaves which are:
1- When I tried to modify or editing an existing user to make some changes
on his privileges. when I clicked on that user i
Hi Friends,
I am planning to deploy a network in the following manner.
R1 ---> PIX INSIDEPIX OUTSIDE --> INTERNET ROUTER
|
PIX DMZ
|
|
R2
R1 ( FOR LEASE LINE AND DDR FOR LEASE LINE)
Dear All,
I just want to get more info about what is new in CCNP Version3
and Is there any new materials for thsi version??
Please advise me
Best regards,,,
Magdy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50623&t=50623
need for more info
Magdy
""Mohannad Khuffash"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear all,
>
> Why not the usage time in the user property not increased when I pass
> through the PIX which get Authentication & Authorization and send
accounting
> to ACS? Not like t
Suppose I have two ABRs that are supporting the same sub-area.
The ABRs are not directly connected, but can reach each other
through links inside the sub-area.
Suppose a link fails causing the two ABRs to not have connectivity
through the sub-area. The sub-area is therefore partitioned.
Suppose
In relation to your last paragraph, once you add the line
redistribute, that router is classed as an asbr.. so the answer is no.
HTH,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: bergenpeak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 4 August 2002 07:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NSSA and related des
17 matches
Mail list logo