Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

Hi, On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:43:20PM +1000, Gunjan GANDHI (BR/EPA) wrote: Because ebgp routes are preferred over ibgp routes. Thats is a tie breaker if the MED is equal. Which it isn't. So indeed this is puzzling. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

Because ebgp routes are preferred over ibgp routes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2007 4:33 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler I can't for the life of me

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gert Doering) wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:43:20PM +1000, Gunjan GANDHI (BR/EPA) wrote: Because ebgp routes are preferred over ibgp routes. Thats is a tie breaker if the MED is equal. Which it isn't. So indeed this is puzzling. I'd say his router wants

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler [NC]

Which Ios are you using ? Are you using bgp bestpath cost-community ignore David Ponsdesserre +44 207 762 4877 - London Telecom and Network Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:43:20PM +1000, Gunjan GANDHI (BR/EPA) wrote: Because ebgp routes are preferred over ibgp routes. Thats is a tie breaker if the MED is equal. Which it isn't. So indeed this is puzzling. Um

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

eBGP prefer to iBGP On 8/1/07, Peter Kranz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't for the life of me figure out why this won't select path #2 as the best path.. can someone unravel what I'm missing.. My goal is to get it to resolve the equal length AS path dispute using the Cost community. Path #1

[c-nsp] VRRP, NAT issue for incoming connections

Hi, I have a customer who has two connections, one ADSL and one leased-line connection, both are for Internet access. They use NAT on both of these connections, and VRRP on the inside interfaces to detect a failure. ADSL is set as the backup interface while the leased-line connection is the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 6509 VRRP no preemption

The issue was caused by the spanning tree behavior on the trunk connecting R1 and R2. R1 became a duplicate VRRP Master on interface VLAN1100 with priority of 200 immediately after the link went up on Gi4/39. After the reconvergence of spanning tree R1 took over R2's Master Role because it had a

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

If I understand correctly, the cost-community is only considered very late in the decision process (among others after as-path, med and e-bgp/i-bgp): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009 4431.shtml All these should be equal before the cost-community kicks

[c-nsp] FWSM activation key

New user of FWSM Just upgraded code to 3.2 The activation key shows all zeros and states that it is using default. Does this sound correct? What is the key used for and do I need it? Thanks for any help. Jeff Fitzwater OIT Network Systems Princeton University

[c-nsp] Features missing from 12.0(31)S6 that are in S3?!

So riddle me this. I run an image comparison between 12.0(31)S3 and 12.0(31)S6 for a 7200, Service Provider and get these features as supported in S3 but not S6: L2VPN Interworking - Ethernet to VLAN Interworking L2VPN Interworking: Ethernet VLAN to ATM AAL5 L2VPN Interworking: Ethernet VLAN

[c-nsp] EoMPLS Hairpin

Anyone know if this is supported/works: ! pseudowire-class ATOM-E encapsulation mpls interworking ethernet ! interface loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.100 no ip address encapsulation dot1q 100 xconnect 1.1.1.1 50 pw-class ATOM-E ! interface

[c-nsp] cisco 2811 and rate-limit

lo guys ... itsme again :| so i'm trying to rate limit some wifi clients. they are eating all the internet pipeline :( i googled and found something like this lines as it follows. in the f0/0 will be adding this 2 rate lines rate-limit input access-group 101 512000 512000 512000

Re: [c-nsp] Configure QoS by time

Time-based ACL maybe? Haven't personally tried it though... Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pablo Almido Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:02 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Configure QoS by time Hi list, Is

Re: [c-nsp] Terminals within Terminals

Ah ha - So very simple. I knew my brain wasn't working right today :-) Brault, Ryan wrote: Ctrl-Shift-6, Ctrl-Shift-6 x. Add another Ctrl-Shift-6 for each session before hitting x. Ryan Brault Illinois Century Network, RTC4 Illinois Department of Central Management Services Kankakee,

[c-nsp] Terminals within Terminals

Maybe I'm just not with it today, but I keep hitting this problem. I reverse telnet from one router into another. From the second router I run a command that runs for a while (e.g. pinging something with 1 packets). if I want to stop it early I would just do Ctrl-Shift-6 x. Works great

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 2811 and rate-limit

I think that you should reduce normal and extended burst, for example I usually configure these way and it works fine, if I want to limit 64Kbps (for upload download) to 192.168.1.20 Normal Burst = configured rate * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds Extended Burst = 2 * normal burst Normal

Re: [c-nsp] 802.1Q double tag on catalyst 3500 ?

If you are referring to 3548XL, then this switch doesn't support 802.1q tunneling. If you are referring to 3550-48, then you can use switchport mode dot1q-tunnel under the port. -- Tassos Chris Cappuccio wrote on 2/8/2007 1:28 πμ: Hey does anyone know how to pass double tagged packets on

Re: [c-nsp] Late night BGP puzzler

MED should not be used under this scenario as both the upstream routes are from different providers. Unless both providers have agreed upon a MED benchmark value, it is not wise to use MED for route selection. It is like comparing oranges with apples. Cheers //Gunjan -Original Message-

[c-nsp] %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer

Hi guyz, I m getting the error Aug 2 07:56:04.321: %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer 528346D0, time 0x32D50DB30 ( 16:02:04 ago). -Process= SNMP Timers, ipl= 5, pid= 158 -Traceback= 41052F18 410534B0 40E95EB0 I think its a SNMP error. it is also not allowing my NMS to poll