___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
IP Plus should be ok for LAC/LNS functionality. If you need the extra features,
then you might need the enterprise one.
--
Tassos
Andrew Jones wrote on 14/3/2008 7:29 πμ:
Hi All,
We got some advice here a while back to use the 12.2SB train on our 7200 LNS
which is terminating l2tp tunnels
Most likely problem can be solved if you switch to 12.4(latest).
Werner Detter wrote:
Hi again,
crashed due to a bus error (bus error at PC 0x6013C4D8, address 0x64588700).
skip
What do you suggest?
Any help or comments appreciated,
Werner
Hi,
Hello all,
I find configuration error in asa acl. There was no accept rule for
255.255.255.255:68.
And now linux gets its ip address. I cant belive that windows gets its
ip addres when there was no 255.255.255.255:68 accept rule in asa.
all clients do DHCP in different ways.
Only
Hello all,
I find configuration error in asa acl. There was no accept rule for
255.255.255.255:68.
And now linux gets its ip address. I cant belive that windows gets its
ip addres when there was no 255.255.255.255:68 accept rule in asa.
Only one thing now is that i cant resolve domain names
Hello,
One Our Ip blocks was last week deleted from the afrinic
database,because of payment issues.
We sorted with Afrinic and they reinstated the Ip blocks.The problem is
the ips in this
blocks cannot access some websites.
Am suspecting that some Networks still see our Ips as Bogons and hence
10008 for us has been a typical cisco platform. Get on the right code
and it's stable. I'm assuming by 8 port channelized card you mean two HH
4 port cards? Just note that AToM isn't supported on that card, only the
6 port, choc12, and 24 port T1 card per the website. Haven't actually
tested in
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 11:06 +0200, Eimantas Zdanevičius wrote:
Only one thing now is that i cant resolve domain names into ip.
if i type 'ping www.google.com', my laptop try to resolve
'www.google.com.mydomain.com'.
Where i need to search for misconfiguration: dhcp server, dhcprelay or
dhcp
Folks.
I wonder if a MPLS domain may get extended though many OSPF areas
(belonging to the same OSPF process)?
Best regards.
MP
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi,
Would it be possible to have a promisc 10GbE port connected to switch
then have that switch as flat layer 2 device with Etherchannel to the
servers there?
Regards,
Jimmy
Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering what peoples experience is with pvlans. We currently have
a large
Murilo Antonio Pugliese wrote on Friday, March 14, 2008 1:10 PM:
Folks.
I wonder if a MPLS domain may get extended though many OSPF areas
(belonging to the same OSPF process)?
sure, just make sure your edge devices know the loopback/BGP next-hop
for all other PE devices in other areas
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote on Friday, March 14, 2008 1:21 PM:
Murilo Antonio Pugliese wrote on Friday, March 14, 2008 1:10 PM:
Folks.
I wonder if a MPLS domain may get extended though many OSPF areas
(belonging to the same OSPF process)?
sure, just make sure your edge devices
Oliver.
Thanks a lot for you replies. I as aware about MPLS TE restriction with
a multi-area ospf network, ...
Currently, OSPF supports MPLS traffic engineering in only a single area
- typically, the backbone or area 0.
http://books.google.com.br/books?id=-NlJnfxBXqwCpg=PA265lpg=PA265dq=%
Murilo Antonio Pugliese mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday,
March 14, 2008 1:34 PM:
Oliver.
Thanks a lot for you replies. I as aware about MPLS TE restriction
with a multi-area ospf network, ...
Currently, OSPF supports MPLS traffic engineering in only a single
area - typically,
Hi,
You may find this link useful:
http://www.ris.ripe.net/debogon/index.shtml
You can also make sure that all your upstream providers are propagating
the prefix correctly using BGPlay or querying Routeviews route server:
http://www.ris.ripe.net/bgplay/
telnet route-views.routeviews.org
More
Dale W. Carder wrote:
On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Michail Litvak wrote:
Does anyone try to use CVR-X2-SFP (Cisco TwinGig Converter Module)
with
cat6500 WS-X6708-10GE module.
I try to insert it but have bad EEPROM.
I would not expect them to work anywhere but on the
3750E, at least for
etherchannels are not supported with PVLN's, if im correct?
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Jimmy Stewpot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to have a promisc 10GbE port connected to switch
then have that switch as flat layer 2 device with Etherchannel to the
servers there?
Hmmm. Well I installed the RAM and it still thinks I have 256M instead of
512M. Checked and upgraded the ROMMON to version 2.2 and am running
12.0(32)S8. Are there different versions of the GRP-B RPs? I know for sure
that the RAM I have is 512M yet the RP still sees it as 256M. Anyone have
any
Hi,
The Ip block is 194.9.82.0/24
I cant actually open the first 2 below links using 194.9.82.187 ip for test.
AnyOne please try to reach this Ip from your networks.
The Number of websites not reachable from this Network is increasing fast.
It is becoming hectic to contact the Admins of the
Hi,
That is correct, Hence putting a 10GbE port which connects into a
switch, then use that switch with an etherchannel given that it has no
pvlan on it directly. Im not sure if it will work, but i would be keen
if anyone can see any reason why it wont work?
Regards,
Jimmy
Christian Koch
On Mar 14, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Felix Bako wrote:
Hi,
The Ip block is 194.9.82.0/24
I cant actually open the first 2 below links using 194.9.82.187 ip
for test.
AnyOne please try to reach this Ip from your networks.
Nanog may be a better place to take this than cisco-nsp.
I'm seeing a
I have 12.2(31)SB11 (c7200-isu2-mz.122-31.SB11.bin) and it has support for
VPDN commands.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Jones
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:29 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Which IOS to
Guys,
I have a 7206 VXR with a PA-MC-T3 card in it for doing T1's off of a
channelized DS3. I know the PA-MC-T3 doesn't support MLPPP bonding of
multiple T1's. The problem is, my NPE doesn't support the newer PA-MC-T3-EC
enhanced card that works for T1 bonding.
I know I could feed the DS3 to
I guess that would be my question. I was under the impression that MLPPP
won't work with that DS3 card. Am I mistaken?
Thanks,
-Nick
From: Jason Berenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:30:39 -0400
To: Nick Voth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Troy,
That makes perfect sense! Thanks.
One other question. I see that you have IP addresses assigned to both serial
interfaces as well as the Multilink4 Interface. What does the 7206 see as
the real IP of that Interface?
In other words, if we needed to route a block of 8 IP's over that circuit
The only reason that we have IP addresses assigned to the serial interfaces
is that we use then to ping using nagios to determine if that link goes
down. You would do:
ip route 67.7.187.16 255.255.255.248 10.0.0.2
assuming that your multilink interface ip address on the vxr is 10.0.0.1/30
The
As opposed to burning up IPs for those links, just for monitoring, you
can monitor the interface oper state via SNMP. I'm using indexing via
description.
Example nagios configuration from my system:
First monitor the IP of the bundle:
define host{
use generic-host
Thanks Darryl. Very good information to have. I will look at changing our
nagios config over as this seems to be a much better way to monitor the
links.
Troy Beisigl
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Dunkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 4:36 PM
To: Troy Beisigl;
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008, Joseph Jackson wrote:
Do you get wire speed out of those GigE ports? I remember reading some where
that the G1 could only push around 750mbs. I can't find the info now so I
might just be crazy.
I don't have any G1/G2's in production. I'm just going off the
[Deleted]
SO, is there any way to accomplish T1 bonding with that existing DS3
card or am I just stuck?
Nick,
Is there any specific reason why you need MLPPP? How about just
using per-packet load balancing? We do that on our PA-MC-T3 via the
following:
interface Serial11/1/0/19:0
ip
Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
Is there any specific reason why you need MLPPP? How about just
using per-packet load balancing? We do that on our PA-MC-T3 via the
following:
I believe MLPPP handles fragmentation better than CEF load sharing, so
you end up with the fragments being received
You should be able to run unnumbered on the Serials and Multilink and
save yourself a boat load of IPs.
Has anyone had problems using /31s with Ciscos recently? I always had
problems with a x.x.x.0/32 loopback, so I'm loathe to try /31s on
anything important :)
Troy Beisigl wrote:
Hi Nick,
Adrian,
We push much more voice over our links so I would worry more about PPS
then wire speed on the GigE.
I'm leaning towards upgrading our NPE-300's to G1's and keep things
split up a bit. One reason is I wouldn't have to learn a new platform
and I would know that everything I'm doing
For what it's worth... we had a 1G that was 80% CPU load with only 120Mb/s
on it - BUT this box was doing lt2p tunnels and PPPOE termination ... again
for what it's worth. We actually don't have any 7206VXR's in production
that are doing pure routing...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We have a client with a network that's got a main hub site and two
'remote' sites. By remote, I mean they're far enough away to have to
be connected by leased metro 1 Gb Ethernet circuits. However, one of
the this is just how it is items is that the two remotes are
actually only a couple of
Why not make your life easy and just run BGP between them? Do a default
originate towards A B (that is from hub-A, hub-B, A-B, B-A) and
use local preference to handle the best path arrangement. Same for
routes originated at A or B. Should be a pretty brain dead
configuration, I would have
[Deleted]
SO, is there any way to accomplish T1 bonding with that existing DS3
card or am I just stuck?
Nick,
Is there any specific reason why you need MLPPP? How about just
using per-packet load balancing? We do that on our PA-MC-T3 via the
following:
interface Serial11/1/0/19:0
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Nick Voth wrote:
and it seems understandable, but I'm not totally sure what it's doing yet.
There's per-packet and per-destination load-sharing and it's not really
clear what would be appropriate for my situation.
Both work well. per-packet generally gives you the most
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Nick Voth wrote:
and it seems understandable, but I'm not totally sure what it's doing yet.
There's per-packet and per-destination load-sharing and it's not really
clear what would be appropriate for my situation.
Both work well. per-packet generally gives you the
Is it at all possible to get a vlan between site A and site B over the
metro E?
If that is possible, it'd be very easy to accomplish what you want by
just adjusting the ospf cost
on the vlan interfaces and the wireless link.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a client with a network that's
40 matches
Mail list logo
