Got it. OSPF was removed from loopback interface
Got it working now
- Original Message
From: Brian Turnbow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:23:52 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] GSR no ldp all of a sudden
I would
Hi Wayne,
Take a look into assigning via radius the vrf for the ppoa sessions.
If you google on the list you will find several discussions on the issue.
You can then use vrf aware firewall features (like vrf aware nat ecc) for
internet access.
On Friday 07 November 2008 16:46:01 Mark Tech wrote:
Got it. OSPF was removed from loopback interface
Just wondering if you have RANCID configured so you can
learn, more quickly, what changes the router has undergone.
Cheers,
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi there.
We have a Simple L3 switch (I think it's a 2960G) that we need to do some even
simpler fault tolerance and load sharing on.
We were going to connect this switch to 3x switches upstream and then do
something like this:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/32 gwip
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Hi all,
I made a RP and SP monitor session. Under the SYN flood i saw the router
got 250 SYN packages before sent back the first ACK,RST packet.
It's normal? When cames the cpu load wave again got more (not much) SYN
without ACK,RST.
I no idea what is this periodic CPU load wave, but i
We're stil on 12.2.31SB13 with g2s mainly due to an issue we found with tcp
header compression with SRC
We have some small vbr connections for voip with header compression enabled and
found that a telnet session over the link would cause the router to crash in
SRC.
Brian
-Original
NVRAM space, then you can use service compress-config but that makes boot
time slower. You have 2MB of NVRAM, mine states 1917KB. But crypto keys and
the such don't show up in sh run and they do take space. Also snmp ifindex
takes space as well.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original
Hi
Actually we do run RANCID in the production network, however these boxes are
still on test :)
Cheers
Mark
- Original Message
From: Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brian Turnbow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 7,
We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we were very
brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue every 3-4
weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop coming in
pretty much via l2tp tunnels).
On the NPE-1G's we're running same release
Thanks... confirmed what I was wondering we have lots of free space
there which takes the concern out the the equation today...;)
Cheers!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: David Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 9:01 AM
To: 'Paul Stewart';
adrian kok wrote:
router#copy running-config tftp
Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3
Destination filename [router-confg]?
TFTP: error code 1 received - File not found
Did you allow the TFTP-Clients to create new files? If not, you will
have to create the file first with
You can always save /boot to/from a copy saved to disk
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Prall
Sent: venerdì 7 novembre 2008 15.01
To: 'Paul Stewart'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Config Length Limit? 7600
Hi
I install tftp server in linux and it is running
router#copy running-config tftp
Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3
Destination filename [router-confg]?
.
%Error opening tftp://192.168.0.3/router-confg (Timed
out)
After checking tftp server in 192.168.0.3, I fix it to
allow
Hi there...
Is there any limits we need to be aware of on a Sup720-3BXL 7600 in regards
to size of configuration files? One of our core routers is hitting about
35k lines of config currently and we may need to add upwards of 50k more to
the configuration in the near future this is mainly
Do you use 12.2(33)SRC2 in a box as Aggregation Router ?
One bug we discovered was a Netflow bug wich resulted in crashes
(CSCsu87248)
kind regards Rinse
Paul Stewart schreef:
We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we were very
brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while
You can make each port a routed interface(/30 or /31) to the 6500. Control
the failover/load balancing with your IGP.
--Pete
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Lacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
I would like to have both of these run
You can try a port-channel and add both interfaces to bundle. This would
provide redundancy + more BW.
Asad
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:30:23
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
Yes, that's correct - LAC/LNS
We don't run Netflow off that box in particular (we do in our core 7600's
though) so haven't come across that bug yet ;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Rinse Kloek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:52 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc:
tftp doest allow to actually create a file. So create that exact same file
on your tftp server then restart your stuff in your router.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:52 AM, adrian kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi
I install tftp server in linux and it is running
router#copy running-config tftp
Most beneficial is to port-channel the interfaces. This is clever in many
ways. Handling the interface redundancy any other way complicates things
IMHO. With a port-channel interface you have more bandwidth and redundancy.
Regards,
Mario
http://www.spinthiras.net/
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:30 PM,
20 matches
Mail list logo