Jay Hennigan wrote:
If you're targeting techies pretending to be a techie and are shown to
be a sales guy before you make your pitch it's a lot harder sell.
And further, DON'T SHOUT ON A WEBSITE, and check your choice of logo :-)
Poggs
___
Hi all,
First, sorry a bit long here with a bunch of questions...
I have a small ISP (~50 customers) and am in the process of
building out a new network. traffic runs ~250Mbit in/out
with ~230k PPS in/230k PPS out. 3 providers, all gig uplinks. the
network does nothing fancy, no MPLS, no QOS,
On Nov 1, 2009, at 12:47 AM, Bill Desjardins wrote:
this reminded me of a point I forgot to mention.. budget. sup2's are
what I can afford.
One is better off not building a network at all than building one
which doesn't provide the baseline functionality necessary to exert
control over
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:15, christian koch c...@sandcastl.es wrote:
looks as if its working based on the activity in this thread...
I think someone has to actually buy something, because of the chatter,
for it
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
this reminded me of a point I forgot to mention.. budget. sup2's are
what I can afford.
One is better off not building a network at all than building one which
doesn't provide the baseline functionality necessary to
On Nov 1, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Bill Desjardins wrote:
I dont see the point that all of sudden I am going to be in despair
and grief with modestly better hardware and a much improved network
architecture.
Sounds as if your network hasn't been seriously attacked, either
directly or as a
Hi all.
Anyone else seeing a 100%+ jump in CPU utilization on a
3560G upgraded from IOS 12.2(44)SE2 to 12.2(52)SE? Average
CPU utilization sat at 5%. Since the upgrade, we're seeing
11% - 12%
I'm suspecting the REP LSL Hello PP software process as
that's chewing up a bit of CPU time. I can't
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote:
On Friday 30 October 2009 12:21:02 am Rick Ernst wrote:
- We do have some peering, but it was originally designed
at the customer/aggregation layer.
Do you mean at or in?
As in, do you have a dedicated peering
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
Sounds as if your network hasn't been seriously attacked, either directly or
as a result of collateral damage - yet.
Its been attacked, but luckily never enough to tear it down (knock
knock..:). I have lots of acl's on
