Re: [c-nsp] 3550 High CPU - nothing in proc cpu

2009-11-15 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Hector Herrera wrote: If I have such a large number of TTL-expired messages, does that mean I have a routing loop somewhere? If so, I have three uplink interfaces, how do I find out which interface is causing the punts? Try show int switching (hidden command, you can't

Re: [c-nsp] 3550 High CPU - nothing in proc cpu

2009-11-15 Thread Hector Herrera
Great, so now I know: from 'show ip cef switching stat' I learned that there is a large number of packets with an expired TTL (TTL-expired is handled by the IP process, ie. software routing) from 'show interface switching' (hidden command) I learned the interface that has a high number of

Re: [c-nsp] 3550 High CPU - nothing in proc cpu

2009-11-15 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Hector Herrera wrote: Since the number of packets in the two commands above are very close to each other, I think I have identified the network interface with the large number of TTL-expired packets. It is a BGP interface, so my best guess is that a BGP neighbour is

[c-nsp] IRIS Project

2009-11-15 Thread luismi
IS there anyone in this mailing list involved with the IRIS project? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

2009-11-15 Thread luismi
Is it supported in any IOS? Does anyone if it is going to be supported in the future? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Mohammad Khalil
hey all i have configured kron to backup my configuration files and all is working fine now i want to take ping values and store it in a file on the TFTP server but the command for example ping y.y.y.y| redirect tftp://x.x.x.x/PING is incorrect so how is the way to do that ?? Thanks in

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Mohammad, Wouldn't IP SLA be a better way to do it? You can also create an EEM script that would be triggered by IP SLA threshold values, so you will get a custom alert. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf

Re: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

2009-11-15 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Which platforms? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of luismi Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 16:12 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels? Is it supported in any IOS? Does

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Mohammad Khalil
hi Arie the problem is that the IOS installed on my switches does not support event manager feature thats why i am looking for kron Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Kron Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:15:56 +0100 From: avay...@cisco.com To: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Mohammad,

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Ryan West
You could graph your rtr/ip sla stats using mrtg or cacti. Sent from handheld. On Nov 15, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: hi Arie the problem is that the IOS installed on my switches does not support event manager feature thats why i am looking for kron

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Mohammad Khalil wrote: i have configured kron to backup my configuration files and all is working fine now i want to take ping values and store it in a file on the TFTP server but the command for example ping y.y.y.y| redirect tftp://x.x.x.x/PING is incorrect so how is the

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Mohammad Khalil
yes ryan thats what i am trying to do , i want to measure latency between 2 sites but my metro ethernet switches does not support ip sla or event manager thats y i am trying to find an alternatives by exporting ping results on a scheduled basis and use a script for graphing them From:

Re: [c-nsp] Kron

2009-11-15 Thread Ryan West
Are you sure it doesn't support RTR? Sent from handheld. On Nov 15, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.commailto:eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: yes ryan thats what i am trying to do , i want to measure latency between 2 sites but my metro ethernet switches does not support ip sla

Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-15 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:27:17PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: What quality networking, we have these days... Hey, at least you *have* BFD. Unlike us folks with SXH and SXI that want to use BFD on SVI interfaces... They

Re: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

2009-11-15 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 03:12:24PM +0100, luismi wrote: Is it supported in any IOS? Does anyone if it is going to be supported in the future? On 7600s, it should work, if you are using routed mode port channels (or subinterfaces). On vlan interfaces, it is not there (yet?). On GSRs, I

Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 16 November 2009 02:59:10 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: They pulled BFD from SVI's on SR code too. Not that it's any more broken than BFD on physical interfaces really. :) I have it configured on physical interfaces on a 7604/RSP720-3CXL running 12.2(33)SRC5. Cheers, Mark.

Re: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

2009-11-15 Thread luismi
7200 npe-g2 and 7600 rsp720-pfc3 El dom, 15-11-2009 a las 16:16 +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) escribió: Which platforms? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of luismi Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009

[c-nsp] Can not establish MP-BGP sessions

2009-11-15 Thread Andy Saykao
Hi All, We migrated a link between two pops onto a Switched Ethernet circuit and since then we can't pass MPLS VPN traffic between those two pops from PE1 to PE2 because PE1 and PE2 can not establish a MP-BGP session. - BGP log on PE1: - Nov 16

Re: [c-nsp] Can not establish MP-BGP sessions

2009-11-15 Thread Alex
Hi Andy, Couple of questions: 1/ Can you ping between PE1 and PE2 _loopbacks_ across the circuit when mpls ip is ON on both Gi4/0/1 and Gi0/2? 2/ Can you establish BGP session between _interface_ addresses when mpls ip is ON on both Gi4/0/1 and Gi0/2? Rgds Alex