On 02/02/2010 18:13, Peter Kranz wrote:
The network is composed of 6509-e chassis with SUP 720 3BXL cards at all
sites..
So far respondents have recommended the following options; (so many ways to
skin this cat..!)
EoMPLS
Cisco Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP)
802.17 (RPR)
Spatial
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:07 +1030, Tom Lanyon wrote:
On 02/02/2010, at 3:29 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
youtube is now IPv6 ready - thanks Lorenzo Colitti (and his
buddies!) but
the 's are only given to their happy ipv6 select partners
(unfortunately
we are not yet one of those
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tom Lanyon t...@netspot.com.au wrote:
They are not handing out an for www.youtube.com but most of the content
(img+video) servers are on v6.
Hmm, really?
I'm speaking to www.youtube.com (youtube-ui.l.google.com) on 2001:4860:c004::64
cheers,
Dale
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:07:23PM +1030, Tom Lanyon wrote:
They are not handing out an for www.youtube.com but most of the
content (img+video) servers are on v6.
Actually you're missing all the fun :-)
www.youtube.com is an alias for youtube-ui.l.google.com.
On 03/02/10 10:57, Dale Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tom Lanyont...@netspot.com.au wrote:
They are not handing out an for www.youtube.com but most of the content
(img+video) servers are on v6.
Hmm, really?
I'm speaking to www.youtube.com (youtube-ui.l.google.com)
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Phil Mayers wrote:
Does anyone know the details - do the google DNS servers choose to reply with
based on AS-path of the querying IP, or netblock? Inbound interface?
When I talked to google, they wanted to know what netblock(s) my resolvers
were in, so I guess it's
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:01:57PM +, Phil Mayers wrote:
Does anyone know the details - do the google DNS servers choose to reply
with based on AS-path of the querying IP, or netblock? Inbound
interface?
Netblock. You register your DNS resolvers' IP address(es) with them,
and
In the tunnel interface configuration, ip vrf forwarding sets the VRF that
traffic in the tunnel is a part of, and tunnel vrf sets the VRF that the
tunnel travels over. Is this what you're asking?
-saxon
On 2 February 2010 21:20, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to configure
AFAIK, SRP was implemented/available in 12K's and 7200's, I used it in a
cmts environment. This was 5 years ago, not sure about the offering
nowdays.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@inex.ie wrote:
On 02/02/2010 18:13, Peter Kranz wrote:
The network is composed of 6509-e
No
AFAIK vPC is already available on N5K/N2K, active/active with FEX should
be possible:
Cisco Nexus 5000 NX-OS Software Rel 4.1(3)N2(1)
A virtual port channel (vPC) allows links that are physically connected to
two different Cisco Nexus 5000 Series switches or Cisco Nexus 2000 Series
Fabric
I'm migrating a network from an old HP Procurve switch to a Cisco 3550.
Simple setup, public and private vlans. Setup a port to be tagged on both
vlans on the HP side, and on the cisco end set it to be in trunking mode.
The cisco sees the vlans. I'm getting the full table from 'show mac
They seem to be an incredibly popular device, especially for telcos as
CPE devices. Why? (I have no use for them, really, and they appear to be
EOL, I'm just really curious.)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I'm using a Catalyst 4948 as a bump in the cable between another network
operator and a metro-ether backhaul to our POP. We land some IP on the
4948 as SVIs for the trunk facing the other operator. Other VLANs are
provisioned as pass-through for out-of-band circuits.
It was my previous
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Jeff Bacon wrote:
They seem to be an incredibly popular device, especially for telcos as
CPE devices. Why? (I have no use for them, really, and they appear to be
EOL, I'm just really curious.)
They're one of cisco's earliest (first?) inexpensive fixed configuration
layer
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Bacon
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:03 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?
They seem to be an incredibly popular
Jeff Bacon wrote:
They seem to be an incredibly popular device, especially for telcos as
CPE devices. Why? (I have no use for them, really, and they appear to be
EOL, I'm just really curious.)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Bacon
Sent: mercoledì 3 febbraio 2010 18.03
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?
They seem to be an incredibly popular device,
They seem to be an incredibly popular device, especially for telcos
as
CPE devices. Why? (I have no use for them, really, and they appear to
be
EOL, I'm just really curious.)
They can do full layer 3 routing, have a diverse selection of model
numbers, do decent QoS, and are cheap,
That is correct. The Nexus 2000 can be connected to two Nexus 5000's with an
active/active virtual port channel (vPC).
However, if you do that, you cannot (yet) connect the Server to the Nexus
2000's with an active/active 802.3ad LACP NIC team.
You can obviously use active/standby teaming, or,
On 2/3/10 12:01 PM, Eric Van Tol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jon Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:30 PM
To: Cory Ayers
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] what is
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:01:33PM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Are you sure about this? I thought that 12.2(44)SE2 has IPv6 support:
Switch1(config)#ipv6 ?
access-list Configure access lists
general-prefix Configure a general IPv6 prefix
hop-limitConfigure hop count
That is in SW only, if memory serves me. Also, I believe it has since been
removed because of that.
Yes, the 3550 has no *hardware* support for IPv6 routing. End of story.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
-Original Message-
From: Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:19 PM
To: e...@edgeoc.net
Cc: Eric Van Tol; cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net; cisco-
n...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?
That is in SW only,
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Yes, the 3550 has no *hardware* support for IPv6 routing. End of story.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
Yes, this is true. But what was said was, You're not going to see IPv6
routing support on the 3550 AFAIK. I wouldn't turn it
So in terms of enabling MPLS on a fully meshed set of routers running BGP
and OSPF..
Here are the general steps I believe;
#conf t
Tag-switching advertise-tags
!
Int g0/0
Mtu 9216
Tag-switching ip
!
However, what can I expect to happen when this is done, i.e. will
The 3550-EMIs, particularly the 3550-12s, were a hot little switch in
their day. L3 routing and up to 10 optical ports would otherwise spell
a 4500 (only 6Gbps at the time) or 6500.
We still use some 3550-12s, doing L3 routing and VRF-lite, pushing those
capabilities out to some areas we
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Nakamura
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:20 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] VRF aware IPSec for remote access without xauth
I am trying to configure vrf aware IPSec VPN for remote
Don't the 3550 have some pretty big TCAM and routed VLAN limitations compared
to their 3560/3750 counterparts?
--
Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:33:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
yep, it is based on the netblocks the resolvers are in, we have it
enabled too and had to provide the subnets that our resolvers send their
outbound queries from.
John van Oppen
Spectrum Networks LLC
Direct: 206.973.8302
Main: 206.973.8300
Website: http://spectrumnetworks.us
-Original
On 03/02/2010, at 9:33 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:07:23PM +1030, Tom Lanyon wrote:
They are not handing out an for www.youtube.com but most of the
content (img+video) servers are on v6.
Actually you're missing all the fun :-)
www.youtube.com is an alias for
A quick search through our inventory and I see current used market prices
are:
WS-C3550-12G $675/ea - $875/ea
WS-C3550-24PWR-SMI - $350/ea - $450/ea
WS-C3550-48-EMI $315/ea - $450/ea
WS-C3550-48-SMI $250/ea - $350/ea
~.~
Best regards,
Larry E. Stites
Acquisitions and Sales
Northern
Hey all...
So we've been having issues with this 6500 for awhile now, just doing random
stuff so we replaced the chassis and one of the Sups, so today while I was at
lunch (doesn't it always happen this way) the switch had one of these:
System returned to ROM by Stateful Switchover (SP by bus
What software release?
--
Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:18:33 -0500
Subject: [c-nsp] 6500 having a seizure
Hey all...
So we've been having issues with
Hi, my cisco 6509 rommon mode still continues..
previously i cleaned up the all modules, changed the batteries, now it is
showing:
rommon 1 boot
open: file c7200-fslib-m not found
open(): Open Error = -1
loadprog: error - on file open
cannot load the monitor library bootflash:%c7200-fslib-m
34 matches
Mail list logo
