[c-nsp] vs sup720-10G

2010-06-11 Thread Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
Hi all. Have anyone seen this error on a sup720-10G. Jun 10 14:19:13.949: %SYS-2-SHARED: Attempt to return buffer with sharecount 0, ptr= 5008ED6C -Process= IP Input, ipl= 5, pid= 272 -Traceback= 42279EC4 40C8A51C 40C66334 4099CBB0 409B6530 409B4868 409B4928 409B4A04 409B4D30 4135AE4C 4135AE38

[c-nsp] Different authentication schemes with the same SSID

2010-06-11 Thread Jonathan Soler (Europe)
Hello, I will like to have only one SSID with different kind of authentication mechanism. For example, if I have some different group of users with different requirements for authentication ¿can all of them use the same SSID? -Guest users: Authenticate them with a guest portal.

[c-nsp] Question about PEAP Radius certificate export (IAS 2003 versus NPS 2008) for Wireless 802.1x WLC

2010-06-11 Thread Manu Chao
By default, is the CA certificate exported to XP clients on the wired Microsoft network domain? When i manually imported the CA certificate on a XP computer, Wireless 802.1x works fine but by default it seems certificate are not exported on the Microsoft Domain :( Is it correct? How can we

[c-nsp] IPv4/v6 Route Reflectors - Which router to choose?

2010-06-11 Thread Jonathan Hart
Hi cisco-nsp followers! I have a question relating to IPv4/v6 route reflectors in SP environments. My question isn’t so much about BGP and the actual RR functionality, as it is about the “right kind of router” for the job. What kinds of qualities are important, except for feature support, when

[c-nsp] E1 packet loss

2010-06-11 Thread Rens
Hi all, I have 2 routers that are connected via a 3rd party E1 circuit. When I ping between my routers I have packet loss. I have done a BER test on the E1 circuit which comes out clean. Already replaced both E1 cards and my cabling, but still having packet loss (between 30 10% depending on

Re: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss

2010-06-11 Thread Mackinnon, Ian
Is your provider providing clock? You are set for clock source internal, try setting it to line. Note my recent experience of traditional TDM type circuits is that there is nobody left at the providers with any clue about TDM. -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss

2010-06-11 Thread Martin Moens
E1 errors are often caused by clocking issues - are you shure you should provide clocking on the A-end? Often clocking is provided by the network. Tried to switch on crc4? Martin On Friday, 11 June, 2010 14:18 Rens wrote: Hi all, I have 2 routers that are connected via a 3rd party E1

Re: [c-nsp] Question about PEAP Radius certificate export (IAS 2003 versus NPS 2008) for Wireless 802.1x WLC

2010-06-11 Thread Ryan West
Manu, -Original Message- Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 7:27 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] Question about PEAP Radius certificate export (IAS 2003 versus NPS 2008) for Wireless 802.1x WLC By default, is the CA certificate exported to XP clients on the wired Microsoft network

[c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP autodiscovery

2010-06-11 Thread Anrey Teslenko
Hello all, Does anyone have the experience in configuration of H-VPLS, using BGP as discovery mechanism? I try to implement this in my network. Everything works fine, but there are some problems. I tune H-VPLS on cisco 7600 series with SIP-400 as uplink and downlink interfaces. I have trouble,

[c-nsp] Is the policy map order signficant and can it be changed?

2010-06-11 Thread John Lange
On the ingress interface I mark VOIP packets with set dscp ef. Then on the Egress I had a class/policy-map that looks looks for dscp ef, and there is another class which matches things based on IP addres which also over-laps the VOIP devices. My question is, when there are overlapping classes in

Re: [c-nsp] Is the policy map order signficant and can it be changed?

2010-06-11 Thread Tim Franklin
On the ingress interface I mark VOIP packets with set dscp ef. Then on the Egress I had a class/policy-map that looks looks for dscp ef, and there is another class which matches things based on IP addres which also over-laps the VOIP devices. My question is, when there are overlapping

[c-nsp] Shaping Device Suggestion

2010-06-11 Thread samir
Great People Hi; I have been asked to implement a solution that will mange fairness between users traffic; I have already used packet shaper ISP 1; the device work very well but the problem here is the price is out of my range this time. Is there a another solution that can provide

[c-nsp] nccm tools

2010-06-11 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Hi i'm looking for a light and free nccm tool , can you advise if anyone has a suggestion thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] open-source nccm tool

2010-06-11 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Hi i'm looking for open-source nccm tool , can you advise if anyone has a suggestion thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss

2010-06-11 Thread Aaron
+1 clock line crc4 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:41, Martin Moens mo...@carrier2carrier.comwrote: E1 errors are often caused by clocking issues - are you shure you should provide clocking on the A-end? Often clocking is provided by the network. Tried to switch on crc4? Martin On Friday, 11

[c-nsp] GGSN

2010-06-11 Thread Sophan Pheng
Hello All, We are trying to implement GGSN with our 7606-S router. In order to run this type of environment I need to have a Service and application Module for IP WS-SVC-SAMI-BB-K9. We are looking to find this used as this will be for a test bed in the inital stages...would any one have one

[c-nsp] null routing in ipv6

2010-06-11 Thread Christian MacNevin
Hello A distinguished and beautifully tanned colleague of mine came up with the wild notion of routing black hole traffic to the ipv6 equivalent Of 127.0.0.2 (::2/128). So far, it's been working. My question is whether this is in fact going to punt everything to the CPU and in fact worsen the

Re: [c-nsp] null routing in ipv6

2010-06-11 Thread Mack McBride
Your brain isn't running IPv6 yet. Pony up the six pack. ::2 will be treated as an unreachable. However, this is bad practice because you can't guaranty someone isn't going to insert a default. Point the d*$% thing at Null0. Mack McBride Network Architect Viawest, Inc. Router#show ipv6 route