Re: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss

2010-06-15 Thread Rens
Side A: 2621XM Side B: 1721 -Original Message- From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us] Sent: lundi 14 juin 2010 21:49 To: Rens; Aaron; Martin Moens Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss Same model routers on both ends? ~Jay Murphy IP Network

Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP autodiscovery

2010-06-15 Thread Anrey Teslenko
Whether somebody can answer my question? Help me please, If you had the same problem 2010/6/11 Anrey Teslenko teslenko.and...@gmail.com Hello all, Does anyone have the experience in configuration of H-VPLS, using BGP as discovery mechanism? I try to implement this in my network. Everything

Re: [c-nsp] IPv4/v6 Route Reflectors - Which router to choose?

2010-06-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 12:28:56 pm McDonald Richards wrote: The 1002-F has the RP1 PPC based CPU - for the speed you really really want the RP2 based x86 64 bit CPUs. They are FAST. Route reflectors are such a critical network function that this is not a place I'd be looking to save

Re: [c-nsp] Building a Route-Server

2010-06-15 Thread Ole Martin Eide
Hi, Recently we built a walled garden solution where the box needed to peer with a couple of hundred Juniper boxes. I did testing with quagga 0.99.15 and bird. Finally I gave up both and went with perls Net::BGP. The reason for giving up quagga being an fsm race condition that seems solved in

Re: [c-nsp] CRS-1 MSC utilization

2010-06-15 Thread Per Carlson
Hi. We are using the 8 port 10GE PLIMs which are 2:1 oversubscribed. The oversubscription of the 8-10GE PLIM is rather complicated. Some of the forwarding paths are restricted by bps, others by pps. This means you must be very careful selecting ports if you tries to avoid contention. Here's a

[c-nsp] Oid Values Help

2010-06-15 Thread jaikar gupta
Hello friends, Can any one help me out with the Oids for the following Events. 1) Link faults: Link up and Link down 2) Port faults: Port down, Port not activated, Port activated, Port up 3) Device up and device down 4) CMTS specific events 5) Power related events 6) Threshold related events

Re: [c-nsp] Oid Values Help

2010-06-15 Thread Neil Robst
Hi Jaikar, 1) Link faults: Link up and Link down - see http://www.oidview.com/mibs/0/IF-MIB.html 2) Port faults: Port down, Port not activated, Port activated, Port up - as above/ 3) Device up and device down - I use a ping to determine this! 4) CMTS specific events - don't know sorry 5) Power

Re: [c-nsp] Oid Values Help

2010-06-15 Thread Daljit Singh
Hi, Please provide the device details, Also elaborate more on the requirement. Best Regards Daljit Singh -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jaikar gupta Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:49 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP autodiscovery

2010-06-15 Thread Martin Moens
Hi Andrey, I have the same problem, but did not find the time yet to dive into this problem. Martin -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Anrey Teslenko Sent: Tue 15-Jun-10 11:43 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP

[c-nsp] Adding circuit ref to a L2TP session on LTS

2010-06-15 Thread Steve Lalonde
Hi Not sure if this is a Radius question or a Cisco question I have an issue where my supplier is unable to give me Calling-Station-Id over an L2TP feed for some types of service. All sessions come to an LTS pool under my control and are then sent on to either my LNS pool or to customers LNS

Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP autodiscovery

2010-06-15 Thread tkapela
You will need to adjust igp cost so that your signaling/sourcing PE router issues/sends tldp via the sip-based interface towards the far-end vpls speakers' loopback address. It would seem that your device is picking a link that's lower cost (via the 10 gig card) which cannot allocate labels for

[c-nsp] Duplicate virtual interface on LNS or no Vi established

2010-06-15 Thread Richard Grimwood
Hi I am new to list and of course I need help. Sorry. Using a cisco 7201 as an LNS with 7201LNS-TH#show ver Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-IPBASE-M), Version 12.4(15)T12, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) approx 600 broadband adsl users connected. But we are suffering from two issues 1/ hung

[c-nsp] Recieving Dying Gasp notifications

2010-06-15 Thread Kaegler, Mike
I have a few remote sites which can be prone to power failures. For various reasons, implementing UPSs with management cards is not suitable and/or desirable. The remote equipment all supports Dying Gasp, however, but I cannot seem to find a way to make my 7200s, 3800s, or 2600s to receive the DG

Re: [c-nsp] Recieving Dying Gasp notifications

2010-06-15 Thread Phil Mayers
On 15/06/10 17:27, Kaegler, Mike wrote: I have a few remote sites which can be prone to power failures. For various reasons, implementing UPSs with management cards is not suitable and/or desirable. The remote equipment all supports Dying Gasp, however, but I cannot seem to find a way to make

Re: [c-nsp] Recieving Dying Gasp notifications

2010-06-15 Thread Garry
On 15.06.2010 18:27, Kaegler, Mike wrote: I have a few remote sites which can be prone to power failures. For various reasons, implementing UPSs with management cards is not suitable and/or desirable. The remote equipment all supports Dying Gasp, however, but I cannot seem to find a way to

[c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread harbor235
I have a 3825 stuck in rommon, I am using a 2800 PCMCIA card in flash, the original is missing, I have assumed filesystems are compatable and that I can use the 2800 PCMCIA. I setup a tftp server to download a new IOS image, the download starts with no problem, the image is transferring fine, then

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Aaron
Xmodem might be you're best bet if tftp doesn't work... Connect via console (assume you already are). First did you confirm that confreg = 0x2102? ROMmon Recovery for the Cisco 3600/3700/3800 Series Routers

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread harbor235
The entire contents of the flash is erased, or so says the dialogue when you initiate tftpdnld. It is a 64M compact flash card. The cf card reader sounds interesting . Xmodem is ongoing, this will be very painful, harbor235 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 13:54 -0400, harbor235 wrote: I setup a tftp server to download a new IOS image, the download starts with no problem, the image is transferring fine, then near the end I get a timeout. And it's not just because the flash card has too little available space? -- Peter

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Murphy, Jay, DOH
As the previous threads have alluded to... it appears you may be requesting download of an image larger that your CF card storage capacity... I would erase some files, and recoup headroom, by initiating a squeeze command. Secondly, I have embedded a link to point you through issues with Rommon

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Andriy Bilous
iirc 3825 has an USB socket which is accessible from rommon and if I am not mistaken you could boot from it. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:09 PM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote: The entire contents of the flash is erased, or so says the dialogue when you initiate tftpdnld. It is a 64M

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread harbor235
The CF card is 64 MB and the image is approx 40MB so that can't be it. I can use the USB port for booting if my rommon version supports it, it does not ;-{ Can I upgrade rommon from rommon? I am still looking via cisco.com, I tried rommon-pref, ot sure how to use that. I kicked off xmodem,

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Murphy, Jay, DOH
Hey that is fine, however, you need to squeeze the slot you have the CF installed into, in order to use the freespace. If you do not initiate a squeeze, you can't use the freespace. This is done after deleting any files, and to use the freespace on CF. So strictly speaking, let's say you have

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Steve McNamara
I'd check the tftp server too (logs?), I remember some servers couldn't transfer files 32Mb, which might fit the problem you're seeing towards the end of the transfer. Try a tftp download from another non-rommon location. Use tftpd32 if that is the problem... Steve On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at

[c-nsp] Shared vs Independent VLAN learning with Q-in-Q

2010-06-15 Thread Derick Winkworth
Does anyone know if there are any Cisco platforms that support IVL with Q-in-Q so the mac lookup is a 72-bit field essentially (both VLANs and MAC address). Just curious... ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] ipv6 static route with tracking

2010-06-15 Thread Brandon Applegate
:( Running 12.2(33) SRE on a 7600 specifically. I have some ipv4 routes nailed to Null with a track statement at the end. I don't have the option on the ipv6 static routes. Is this something that was overlooked in development, or is there some deep IOS code reason why this doesn't exist ?

[c-nsp] xmodem file transfer

2010-06-15 Thread scott owens
If you have to do this again - you can change the baud rate to either 57600 or 115200 and change your comm software. and you can do a xmodem-1K xfer which is somewhat akin to jumbo frames via serial . dont forget to put back to 9600 at both rommon config Message: 10 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010

Re: [c-nsp] xmodem file transfer

2010-06-15 Thread Aaron
If the file is over 32mb you need to ensure your tftp server supports large file size. For windows, I've had success with tftpd32 http://tftpd32.jounin.net/ Solaris 9 and 10 should have large file support as do recent versions of bsd and linux. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 21:04, scott owens

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 stuck in rommon

2010-06-15 Thread Christopher J. Wargaski
Hey-- Can you connect the card to your workstation or laptop? I recently worked on a project that required multiple 3845 routers. I upgraded the IOS and placed a base config each flash card with my laptop (flash card reader with a USB interface on it). Windows XP saw the flash card as