I was quite sure that this kind of bug was related to having access-list
compiled option enabled, I never had problems before that
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pete Lumbis
Sent: Wednesday, July 07,
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Pete Lumbis wrote:
This is part of standard ACL optimization. This optimization completely
disregards comments. It's annoying and a bug was filed eons ago about this
and it was junked as part of expected behavior. See CSCdu55701.
-Pete
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Ruben
What is the cheapest Cisco desktop switch that supports Q-in-Q? Is it the
ME-3400G-2CS-A? We prefer the encapsulation dot1q x second-dot1q y
approach.
Your last sentence doesn't make sense here.
Q-in-Q generally refers to *tunneling* one VLAN trunk through an L2
network by adding an extra
Good morning everyone,
I have a question: Other than something like 2547oDMVPN, is there any
implementation of an RFC4797 style PE-PE interconnect using an IP only (no
mpls) core? Where the outer-most transit label is replaced with an IP
header, or GRE header?
Thanks,
John
Thus spake Frank Bulk (frnk...@iname.com) on Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:37:22PM
-0500:
I was working on a Foundry/Brocade this week trying to some Q-in-Q - do you
mean 0x8100 versus 0x9100?
Yes.
Dale
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi,
I have a question: Other than something like 2547oDMVPN, is there any
implementation of an RFC4797 style PE-PE interconnect using an IP only
(no
mpls) core? Where the outer-most transit label is replaced with an IP
header, or GRE header?
You can do mpls on a gre tunnel, just configure
Thanks Jeremy, we're going to end up going the same route
after I looked into it more with the information Brad
posted. We don't have a ten gig core yet so looks like
I'm buying some new core switches too just to get backup
traffic in and out since I don't want to do link
aggregation (assuming
One other consideration - the ten gig ports on the Fabric
Interconnects are licensed, you get 8 enabled by default on the 6120
and 16 on the 6140, above that you're paying enough that a pair of
5010's start looking very economic, never mind all the issues that
come with running in switch rather
Artyom Viklenko ar...@aws-net.org.ua wrote:
Can you show output of 'sh int gi1/0/9'?
What MTU you see in it?
MTU looks correct:
GigabitEthernet1/0/9 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is .. (bia ..)
MTU 9000 bytes, BW
Is there any way to exit from the TL1 command line of an OADM? Once I telnet
into the device, I can't find any way to exit the session. None of the obvious
commands (exit; quit; bye; etc.) work. I've scoured the reference book
without finding anything. I'm SSH'd into a Sun server, and then
*Step 4 *Type the Cancel User command to close a TL1 session:
*CANC-USER:[TID]:USERID:CTAG;*
*
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/optical/15000r9_0/tl1/sonet/reference/guide/tl1a90r_prprv.html#wp26568
*
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 18:00, Daniel D Jones ddjo...@riddlemaster.orgwrote:
Is there any
Thanks for explaining the semantical differences. What I'm looking to do is
the termination -- wouldn't the ME3400 do the trick?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:56 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc:
Does it have to be a switch?
As of 12.4(24)T3 you can do this on ISRs and 7200s...
From: Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com
To: sth...@nethelp.no
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 10:09:59 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cheapest Cisco desktop
Gary,
DeeWhy Plus will contain the fix.
timeframe for that is approximately late August.
cheers,
lincoln.
On 06/07/2010, at 6:09 AM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
Just a quick update for everyone. It appears the fix is two releases
away. The first (Deewhy Plus) is going to be based on 4.2 and
14 matches
Mail list logo
