Is anyone having issues with rancid collecting the inventory when there are ^
characters in the output?
!NAME: temperature outlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 outlet temperature Sensor
!NAME: temperature inlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 inlet temperature Sensor
+ !NAME: temperature device-1 9 , DESCR:
Hello list,
And has anyone good recommendations for an IP Management tool to handle the
stockcontrol, allocations and assignments of Ipv4 and Ipv6 addresses for a
telecoms company ?
I have been googling around and hit some links already but I wanted some
feedback from you guys out there.
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou ach...@forthnet.gr wrote:
Is anyone having issues with rancid collecting the inventory when
there are ^ characters in the output?
!NAME: temperature outlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 outlet temperature Sensor
!NAME: temperature inlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 inlet
On 09/06/2010 10:23 PM, chris stand wrote:
For those of you who are doing 10 Gb connections what are you using for
packet capture and analysis ? Same tools you used at 1 Gb ?
How about port aggregation ? Smart taps ?
It depends
Search the archives for previous questions I've asked on URL
Does the 36/3800 do T1 CES?
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I can't comment on pricing, but I've been testing a 36/3800 demo unit and if
you can wait, this box will be the ultimate PE. We're going to build an
entirely L3 network using these boxes and provide L2 services
Mohammad Khalil wrote:
hi all
we use OSPF to transport customers routers into our backbone , i read in one
of Cisco presentations that its best to use BGP for the same purpose
For MPLSVPN/VRF deployments, we refuse to run anything other than BGP
with the CE. We don't want the overhead of
Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr writes:
And has anyone good recommendations for an IP Management tool to handle the
stockcontrol, allocations and assignments of Ipv4 and Ipv6 addresses for a
telecoms company ?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/haci/
http://tipp.tobez.org/
No, just ethernet.
--
Tassos
Phil Bedard wrote on 07/09/2010 13:26:
Does the 36/3800 do T1 CES?
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I can't comment on pricing, but I've been testing a 36/3800 demo unit and if
you can wait, this box will be the ultimate PE. We're going to
Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:03:47AM +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou:
We get daily differences (whole config parts are removed and readded),
because rancid believes that something has changed, although this is not the
case.
Probably has to do with the expect code.
possibly; but doubtful. when i
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, john heasley wrote:
Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:03:47AM +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou:
We get daily differences (whole config parts are removed and readded), because
rancid believes that something has changed, although this is not the case.
Probably has to do with the expect
Thanks for your test config! The main thing I see different here is that you
have two default routes. In my case, the default needs to be the sdsl
interface and only http/https should go out the vdsl interface.
I get the routing to work, but NAT doesn't work going out the vdsl interface.
Thanks for the help!
I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
deny tcp any any eq www
deny tcp any any eq 443
deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0
Great
From any of these: Is it possible to register the same IPrange several times?
Example: 10.0.0.0/24 might be used by several different customers in different
MPLS VPN's.
DHCP/DNS functionality would probably be disabled unless the DHCP server are
MPLS aware in some way
Jon Harald Bøvre
I think I have hit this before. What version of code are you running and I
will check my old
cases for a Bug ID.
If its the bug I think you are running a 7600 and SR code.
Thanks and regards
Kevin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
ach...@forthnet.grwrote:
Is anyone
Hi,
I need to establish GRE over IPSec between SRX and Cisco Router in my Lab,
kindly suggest configuration for both devices. Kindly find attached LAB
Topology. I need Communication between 192.168.1.0/24 and 172.16.10.0/24,
172.16.20.0/24.
--
Regards,
Atif
Check this link out,
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1498451
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Ray Davis ray-li...@carpe.net wrote:
Thanks for the help!
I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
deny tcp any any eq
Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Alexander Clouter:
!NAME: temperature outlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 outlet temperature
Sensor
!NAME: temperature inlet 9 , DESCR: module 9 inlet temperature Sensor
+ !NAME: temperature device-1 9 , DESCR: module 9 device-1 temperature
Sensor
+
So, I have this hsrp lab setup with a coulple PE routers and come CE routers.
Everything works and all is well. I wanna know how the 2 PE routers that are
playing in the hsrp role notify other PE routers upstream or if they do. So
for example, I have one CE1 router attached to PE1 and PE2
Dear All,
One more query what is the best tool to do the testing (software based),
iperf , netperf ? iperf packet size selection only available for UDP. I
havn't try netperf ? I tried with Mikrotik bandwidth test tool (
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/btest.exe) for 1841 Cisco router 64bytes
its
19 matches
Mail list logo
